Cri.W.P. No.785/2017 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.785 OF 2017
Petitioner : Shri Nilesh s/o Ganeshrao Alone,
Aged about 32 years, Occupation : Service,
R/o. C/o. Office of Superintendent,
Railway Mail Services, F. Division,
Sorting Assistant, GPO, Civil Lines, Nagpur.
-- Versus --
Respondents : 1] Smt. Manisha w/o Nilesh Alone,
Aged about 37 years, Occupation : Service,
R/o. C/o. Sudhakar Balkrishna Patil,
29/7, MIG Colony, Trimurti Nagar, Nagpur.
2] Master Parth s/o Nilesh Alone,
Aged 4 years, through Natural Guardian Mother,
Smt. Manisha N. Alone, i.e. N.A. No.1 as above.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Shri A.V. Bhide, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mrs. K.S. Lakshmi, Advocate for the Respondents.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
C ORAM : S.B. SHUKRE, J.
DATE : 9
th JANUARY, 2018.
ORAL JUDGMENT :-
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by
consent.
02] After hearing this matter for some time, the learned Counsel for
the respondents states on instructions that the respondents would have no ::: Uploaded on - 11/01/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2018 01:57:12 ::: Cri.W.P. No.785/2017 2 objection in giving access of Parth to the petitioner on every Saturday between 05:00 p.m. and 06:30 p.m. at N.I.T. Garden, Trimurti Nagar, Nagpur till final disposal of Petition No.E-91/2015, pending before the Family Court at Nagpur.
03] The learned Counsel for the petitioner is agreeable to such an arrangement enabling the petitioner to exercise his visitation right in respect of child-Parth.
04] In view of the above, it is directed that the access of Parth shall be allowed to the petitioner by the respondent-wife on every Saturday starting with 13th January, 2018 from 05:00 p.m. to 06:30 p.m. at N.I.T. Garden, Trimurti Nagar, Nagpur till final disposal of Petition No.E-91/2015 pending before the Family Court at Nagpur, subject to the condition that on or before 12th January, 2018, the petitioner shall deposit in the Family Court at Nagpur an amount of Rs.10,000/- as interim educational expenses of the child. The impugned order is thus quashed and set aside. 05] Rule is made absolute in the above terms.
06] Authenticated copy of the order be furnished to the learned Counsel for the parties.
(S.B. SHUKRE, J.) *sdw ::: Uploaded on - 11/01/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 12/01/2018 01:57:12 :::