4. cri wp 3920-17.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3920 OF 2017
Stive @ Lisban John Miranda .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
...................
Appearances
Mr. Manas N. Gawankar Advocate for the Petitioner
Mrs. G.P. Mulekar APP for the State
...................
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 13, 2017.
ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner preferred an application for parole on 22.5.2017, however, the learned APP states that the application for parole was preferred by the petitioner on 10.6.2017. The said application was rejected by order dated 11.8.2017.
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
::: Uploaded on - 13/10/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 14/10/2017 02:44:29 :::
4. cri wp 3920-17.doc
Being aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred an appeal. The grievance of the petitioner is that till today, his appeal has not yet been decided. In this view of the matter, the Competent Authority to decide the appeal of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today.
3. Rule is made absolute in the above terms.
[ M.S. KARNIK, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2
::: Uploaded on - 13/10/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 14/10/2017 02:44:29 :::