Vaishali Komeshwar Shende And ... vs Returning Officer, Gram ...

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 8223 Bom
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2017

Bombay High Court
Vaishali Komeshwar Shende And ... vs Returning Officer, Gram ... on 13 October, 2017
Bench: Z.A. Haq
                                                                                  1                                                                wp6540.17

                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR


                                                       WRIT PETITION NO.6540/2017

1.         Vaishali Komeshwar Shende,
           Age 33, Occu. Housewife. 

2.         Pushpa Devidas Garkavar,
           Age 3o, Occu. Housewife.

           Both R/o Gadisurla, Tq. Mul, 
           Distt. Chandrapur.                                                                                                                         ..Petitioners.

                          ..Vs..

           Returning Officer,
           Gram Panchayat, Gadisurla, Tq. Mul, 
           Distt. Chandrapur.                                                     ..Respondent.
  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
           Shri N.S. Warulkar, Advocate h/f Shri A.V. Band, Advocate for the petitioners. 
           Smt. M.A. Barabde, A.G.P. for the respondent.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 


                                                                 CORAM :  Z.A. HAQ, J.
                                                                 DATE  :     13.10.2017.



ORAL JUDGMENT

1.                        Heard.



2.                        Rule.   Rule made returnable forthwith.



3. The petitioners have filed this joint petition and have challenged the decisions of the Returning Officer by which the nomination forms submitted by the petitioners are accepted in the general category overlooking ::: Uploaded on - 13/10/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 14/10/2017 02:48:55 ::: 2 wp6540.17 that the petitioners submitted the nomination forms offering their candidature for the seats reserved for general (woman) category.

4. The learned Advocate for the petitioners and the learned A.G.P. submitted that the controversy is covered by the judgment given by this Court in Writ Petition No.6589/2017 on 6th October, 2017. By this judgment it is held that the nomination form cannot be rejected only relying on the entries in Clause (1) of the nomination form, where the reference to the seat is made by letters "v" , "c", and "d", and the other entries / details given in the nomination form should also be considered. The details given by the petitioners in their nomination forms clearly show that the petitioners offered their candidature for the seats for general (woman) category and not for the seats available for the general candidates.

5. This Court passed an interim order on 5th October, 2017 directing the Returning Officer to provisionally accept the nomination forms of the petitioners and to take all consequential necessary steps in the matter. The Advocate for the petitioners and the learned A.G.P. have submitted that the nomination forms of the petitioners are accepted.

6. In view of the above, following order is passed:

The decisions of the Returning Officer rejecting the nomination ::: Uploaded on - 13/10/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 14/10/2017 02:48:55 ::: 3 wp6540.17 forms of the petitioners are modified.

The respondent / Returning Officer is directed to treat the petitioners as validly nominated candidates for the election of Grampanchayat Gadisurla, Tq. Mul, Distt. Chandrapur and to take all consequential necessary steps in the matter.

Rule made absolute in the above terms.

In the circumstances, the parties to bear their own costs.

JUDGE Tambaskar.

::: Uploaded on - 13/10/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 14/10/2017 02:48:55 :::