908. appw 496.17.doc
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2695 OF 2017
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 496 OF 2017
Pandit Shankar Kalan .. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Santosh S.Musale, for the Petitioner.
Mr.Arfan Sait, APP for State.
CORAM : SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
24th NOVEMBER, 2017 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER SMT.
V .K.TAHILRAMANI, J. ) :
1. The grievance of the petitioner is that though by order dated 26/07/2017, the authorities were directed to decide the parole application, but till today, the parole application has not been decided. Learned APP states that by order dated 23/11/2017, the said application has been decided. The copy of the said application is handed over to the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
1/2 ::: Uploaded on - 24/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 25/11/2017 01:47:25 :::
908. appw 496.17.doc
2. In view of the fact that the application for parole has been decided by the authorities, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this Petition with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings. In view of the statement, Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Rule is discharged.
3. As the Writ Petition has been disposed of, the Criminal Application in Writ Petition has become infructuous and the same stands disposed of accordingly. (M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.) 2/2 ::: Uploaded on - 24/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 25/11/2017 01:47:25 :::