Tatyarao Mohanrao Magre And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 8995 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 November, 2017

Bombay High Court
Tatyarao Mohanrao Magre And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 23 November, 2017
Bench: R.V. Ghuge
                                                              W.P. No.1104/2008
                                      (( 1 ))

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

                               BENCH AT AURANGABAD



                        WRIT PETITION NO.1104 OF 2008


 1.

Tatyarao s/o Mohanrao Magre, Age 48 years, Occu. Business, R/o Kingaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

2. Vinayak s/o Shamrao Jadhav, Age 52 years, Occu. Business, R/o Vavna, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

3. Balaji s/o Bandu Zalte, Age 53 years, Occu. Business, R/o Pimpalgaon (Ga), Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

4. Radhakishan s/o Dhanaji Wagh, Age 47 years, Occu. Business, R/o Vadodbajar, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

5. Sau. Manisha w/o Bhavsing Rajput Age 32 years, Occu. Business, R/o Nidhona, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

6. Sk. Khajabhai Sk. Ladubhai Age 51 years, Occu. Business, R/o Nidhona, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

7. Laxman s/o Ahelaji Pande Age 54 years, Occu. Business, R/o Mamnabad, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

8. Pralhad Patil Dakale Age 47 years, Occu. Business, R/o Georai (Gungi), Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

::: Uploaded on - 28/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 29/11/2017 01:11:11 :::

W.P. No.1104/2008 (( 2 ))

9. Vithal s/o Gopala Wadekar, Age 50 years, Occu. Business, R/o Chincholi (N), Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

10. Pundlik s/o Totaram Gaikwad, Age 45 years, Occu. Business, R/o Naigaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

11. Subhash s/o Gitaram Shinde, Age 44 years, Occu. Business, R/o Sultanwadi, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

12. Mithu s/o Bhaurao Chopde Age 49 years, Occu. Business, R/o Naigavhan, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

13. Sau. Kamlabai w/o Ambadas Shrikhande Age 37 years, Occu. Business, R/o Wahegaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

14. Sudam s/o Patilba Mate Age 47 years, Occu. Business, R/o Bilda, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

15. Narsing s/o Begaji Deore, Age 54 years, Occu. Business, R/o Gumstala, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

16. Namdeo s/o Sandu Mankape Age 48 years, Occu. Business, R/o Jategaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

17. Dhanaji Manaji Dhude Age 51 years, Occu. Business, R/o Daregaon (Dari), Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

18. Vishvambar s/o Pundlik Nikam Age 46 years, Occu. Business, R/o Wanegaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

::: Uploaded on - 28/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 29/11/2017 01:11:11 :::

W.P. No.1104/2008 (( 3 ))

19. Shailendra s/o Ambadas Tiwari, Age 48 years, Occu. Business, R/o Ganori, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

20. Bhavsingh s/o Aaram Rajput Age 40 years, Occu. Business, R/o Lalwan, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

21. Devidas s/o Bhimrao Thorat Age 47 years, Occu. Business, R/o Bhoygaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

22. Dalsingh Bajrang Age 49 years, Occu. Business, R/o Malodyachi Wadi, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

23. Santosh s/o Jagannath Misal, Age 45 years, Occu. Business, R/o Phulambri, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

24. Ajay s/o Wamanrao Sherkar Age 46 years, Occu. Business, R/o Phulambri, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

25. Umakant s/o Kondiba Adhav, Age 43 years, Occu. Business, R/o Phulambri, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

26. Baburao s/o Khando Dindore, Age 44 years, Occu. Business, R/o Dhamangaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

27. Smt. Shobhabai w/o Kashinath Shewale, Age 32 years, Occu. Business, R/o Phulambri, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

28. Dipak s/o Bhagaji Wagh, Age 49 years, Occu. Business, R/o Phulambri, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

::: Uploaded on - 28/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 29/11/2017 01:11:11 :::

W.P. No.1104/2008 (( 4 ))

29. Bhaginath Gajaba Tarte Age 47 years, Occu. Business, R/o Babhulgaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

30. Pharjanbi Daudshaikh Age 33 years, Occu. Business, R/o Dhamangaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

31. Sahebrao s/o Trimbak Badke Age 51 years, Occu. Business, R/o Sweta, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

32. Kachru s/o Bala Balle Age 49 years, Occu. Business, R/o Mhasla, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

33. Vijay s/o Uttamrao Bhisane Age 46 years, Occu. Business, R/o Sonari, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

34. Asaram s/o Eknath Kadam Age 52 years, Occu. Business, R/o Relgaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

35. Bhagwan s/o Kisan Bhivsane Age 48 years, Occu. Business, R/o Babra, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

36. Gorakhnath s/o Umaji Katkar Age 47 years, Occu. Business, R/o Khamgaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

37. Bajirao s/o Dagdu Lahane Age 50 years, Occu. Business, R/o Lahanyachi Wadi, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

38. Chagan s/o Bala Kakade Age 45 years, Occu. Business, R/o Waghalgaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

::: Uploaded on - 28/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 29/11/2017 01:11:11 :::

W.P. No.1104/2008 (( 5 ))

39. Bhagwan s/o Anajda Jadhav Age 48 years, Occu. Business, R/o Sanjul, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

40. Sakharam s/o Waluka Kolte Age 51 years, Occu. Business, R/o Kavitkheda, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

41. Deosing s/o Bhika Chandanse Age 47 years, Occu. Business, R/o Stala (Bu.), Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

42. Motilal s/o Kachru Patthe Age 46 years, Occu. Business, R/o Lohagad Nandra, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

43. Mithu s/o Shripati Jadhav, Age 49 years, Occu. Business, R/o Wanegaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

44. Smt. Mirabai Shinarayan Jaiswal Age 35 years, Occu. Business, R/o Stal Pimpri, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

45. Tejrao s/o Vitthal Vivtekar Age 52 years, Occu. Business, R/o Murshidabadwadi, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

46. Ansaram s/o Ramji Theple Age 47 years, Occu. Business, R/o Pal, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

47. Kailash s/o Taruba Jadhav, Age 45 years, Occu. Business, R/o Jatwa, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

48. Shaikh Shafiq Shaikh Mithu Age 44 years, Occu. Business, R/o Umravati, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

::: Uploaded on - 28/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 29/11/2017 01:11:11 :::

W.P. No.1104/2008 (( 6 ))

49. Sanjay s/o Ganpat Khambat Age 47 years, Occu. Business, R/o Umravati, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

50. Madhavrao s/o Rangnath Jadhav, Age 50 years, Occu. Business, R/o Aland, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

51. Vinayak s/o Asaram Arsul Age 49 years, Occu. Business, R/o Ranjangaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

52. Niranjan s/o Sundarprasad Tiwari Age 43 years, Occu. Business, R/o Ganori, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

53. Bhaskar s/o Mahadu Gaikwad Age 46 years, Occu. Business, R/o Waghala, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

54. Kondiba s/o Gundiba Gadekar Age 42 years, Occu. Business, R/o Adgaon Ku., Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

55. Santaram s/o Kachru Chavan Age 48 years, Occu. Business, R/o Kingaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

56. Gangadhar s/o Sampatrao Sonwane Age 44 years, Occu. Business, R/o Khamgaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

57. Narendra s/o Uttamrao Deshmukh Age 54 years, Occu. Business, R/o Borgaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

58. Sarangdhar s/o Baburao Gadekar Age 47 years, Occu. Business, R/o Pirbawda, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

::: Uploaded on - 28/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 29/11/2017 01:11:11 :::

W.P. No.1104/2008 (( 7 ))

59. Kalyan s/o Bhaginath Gadekar Age 45 years, Occu. Business, R/o Marsavali, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

60. Rajendra s/o Bankatrao Kale Age 49 years, Occu. Business, R/o Pal, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad.

61. Anusayabai w/o Raosaheb Jadhav, Age 48 years, Occu. Business, R/o Babhulgaon, Tq. Phulambri, District Aurangabad. ... PETITIONERS VERSUS

1. The State of Maharashtra through the Principal Secretary, Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department for State of Maharashtra, Mumbai

2. The Collector, Aurangabad Taluka and District Aurangabad

3. The District Supply Officer, Aurangabad, Taluka and District Aurangabad

4. The Tahsildar, Phulambri, Tq. Phulambri, Dist. Aurangabad (Copies for respondent Nos.1 to 4 to be served on Govt. Pleader, High Court, Bench at Aurangabad) ... RESPONDENTS .....

Shri Amol Gandhi, Advocate for petitioners Mrs. M.A. Deshmukh, Addl. G.P. for respondents .....

CORAM: RAVINDRA .V. GHUGE AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATED : 23rd NOVEMBER, 2017.

::: Uploaded on - 28/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 29/11/2017 01:11:11 :::

W.P. No.1104/2008 (( 8 )) ORAL JUDGMENT (PER RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.):

1. By this petition, the petitioners have challenged the proclamation dated 9.1.2008, issued by the District Supply Officer, Aurangabad, for fresh allotment of fair price shops for kerosene licences in the respective villages under Phulambri Taluka. The impugned order was issued on the basis of the notification issued by the State Government, which was subject matter of Writ Petition No.698/2008 (Baburao Namdeo Ragade & ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors., and connected Writ Petitions. By order dated 21.12.2010, this Court dismissed all the petitions.

2. After the dismissal of the petitions, the counsel for the petitioners made a request for maintaining status quo with respect to the distribution of kerosene for a period of three months, from the date of the order. The said request was accepted, and status quo with regard to the right to vend kerosene, was protected for three months. In the above said period of three months, the petitioners, in those matters, are said to have approached the Hon'ble Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal bearing No.7743/2001. By the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court, the judgment of this Court, dated 21.12.2010, was sustained and the Special Leave Petition was dismissed.

::: Uploaded on - 28/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 29/11/2017 01:11:11 :::

W.P. No.1104/2008 (( 9 ))

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, since this petition is on identical set of facts, and since the grievance of those petitioners, identically placed with these petitioners, have suffered an adverse order before the Hon'ble Apex Court, he prays for a similar protection of maintaining status quo in respect of distribution of kerosene for a period of three months from today.

4. In another group of matters, in Writ Petition No.3001/2009 (Venkatrao Manikrao Kendre Vs. State of Maharashtra & ors.) and connected matters, this Court has delivered its order on 26.2.2016, dismissing those petitions as well.

5. We cannot be oblivious to the fact that, after the judgment dated 21.12.2010, those petitioners who had suffered dismissal of their petitions, desired to approach the Hon'ble Apex Court. It was in those circumstances that they were granted status quo for a period of three months. Now that the challenge to the judgment of this Court before the Hon'ble Apex Court has been negated with the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition, we do not find any reason to accede to the request of the petitioners that, status quo for a period of three months be granted.

6. Nevertheless, we are conscious of the fact that, a sudden disruption of vending of kerosene under the orders of this ::: Uploaded on - 28/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 29/11/2017 01:11:11 ::: W.P. No.1104/2008 (( 10 )) Court would affect the fair price shop cardholders. We, therefore, deem it appropriate to allow the petitioners to vend kerosene only for a period of one month from today, during which period, the State Government would initiate appropriate steps so as to ensure that the cardholders are not put to any inconvenience.

7. In the light of the above, this petition is dismissed.

The petitioners would be permitted to vend the kerosene in accordance with the rules, for a period of one month from today.

It is expected that the State Government would ensure steps for making proper arrangement so that, after one month the cardholders would not be put to any inconvenience or hardships.

8. Rule is discharged.




          ( SUNIL K. KOTWAL )             ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE )
               JUDGE                             JUDGE




 fmp/




::: Uploaded on - 28/11/2017                   ::: Downloaded on - 29/11/2017 01:11:11 :::