Sunil Vishwanath Gaikwad vs The State Of Maharashtra

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 8517 Bom
Judgement Date : 7 November, 2017

Bombay High Court
Sunil Vishwanath Gaikwad vs The State Of Maharashtra on 7 November, 2017
Bench: V.K. Tahilramani
                    jdk                                                 1                                              5.crwp.3601.17.j.doc


                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                   CRIMINAL WRIT PETITOIN NO. 3601 OF 2017

                   Sunil Vishwanath Gaikwad                                                        .. Petitioner

                                       Vs.

                   The State of Maharashtra                                                        ..Respondent

                                                 ....
                   Mr. Hitesh P. Shah Advocate for Petitioner
                   Mr. Arfan Sait A.P.P. for State
                                                 ....

                                                           CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND
                                                                   M.S.KARNIK, JJ.

DATED : NOVEMBER 07, 2017 ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. ]: 1 Heard both sides. Rule. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith and matter is heard finally. 2 The prayer of the petitioner in this petition is that his furlough appeal be decided expeditiously. 3 It is stated that the furlough appeal has already been decided. In this view of the matter, this petition is infructous and is disposed of as such. Rule is discharged. [ M.S.KARNIK, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] kandarkar 1 of 1 ::: Uploaded on - 09/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 10/11/2017 01:34:03 :::