1 W.P.No.12747/17
UNREPORTED
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO.12747 OF 2017
Atmaram Jagannath Patil,
Age 54 years, Occ.Legal
Practitioner(Advocate),
R/o Morgaon, Tq.Raver,
Dist.Jalgaon.
At present R/o Plot No.34,
Govardhan Kunj, N-4, CIDCO,
Aurangabad, Tq. and Dist.
Aurangabad. ... Petitioner.
Versus
1. The State of Maharashtra
through Principal Secretary,
Social Justice Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai--32.
2. District Level Caste
Certificate Scrutiny
Committee, Jalgaon,
Dist.Jalgaon through
its Member Secretary. ... Respondents.
...
Mr.M.S.Deshmukh, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.S.W.Munde, A.G.P. for the State.
...
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND
SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI,JJ.
Date : 02.11.2017.
::: Uploaded on - 06/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 07/11/2017 01:25:00 ::: 2 W.P.No.12747/17 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S.V.Gangapurwala,J.)
1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing.
2. Mr.Deshmukh, learned counsel submits that the petitioner is issued with the caste certificate of 'Kunbi' (OBC). The petitioner had submitted proposal seeking verification of his caste claim with the Respondent No.2 Committee, however, the same is not accepted on the ground that it is not submitted through any institution. The learned counsel submits that even if an individual submits the proposal, the Committee has to verify it.
3. We have heard learned A.G.P.
4. Time and again, we have directed the Respondent No.2 Committee to accept the proposal for verification of the caste claim even if the said proposal is submitted by the individual provided that the proposal is in a proper format. ::: Uploaded on - 06/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 07/11/2017 01:25:00 ::: 3 W.P.No.12747/17
5. The Respondent No.2 Committee shall accept the proposal submitted by the petitioner in proper format for verification of his caste claim. Upon submission of the proposal in a proper format for verification of his caste claim by the petitioner, the Respondent No.2 Committee shall decide the same expeditiously, preferably within four (4) months. The petitioner shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the said proceedings.
6. Rule accordingly made absolute in above terms. No costs.
Sd/- Sd/-
(SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
asp/office/wp12747.17
::: Uploaded on - 06/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 07/11/2017 01:25:00 :::
4 W.P.No.12747/17
::: Uploaded on - 06/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 07/11/2017 01:25:00 :::