Indubai Vishnu Bobade vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 8365 Bom
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2017

Bombay High Court
Indubai Vishnu Bobade vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 2 November, 2017
Bench: S.V. Gangapurwala
                                       1                       W.P.No.12524/16

                                      UNREPORTED

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
                                  AT BOMBAY

                                BENCH AT AURANGABAD.




                           WRIT PETITION NO.12524 OF 2016


          Smt.Indubai W/o Vishnu
          Bobade, Age 40 years,
          Occ.Household, R/o
          Pimpalgaon (Alwa), Tq.
          Jamkhed, Dist.Ahmednagar.               ... Petitioner.


                           Versus

          1. The State of Maharashtra
          through the Secretary
          Rural Development Department
          Mantralaya,Mumbai-32.

          2. The Caste Certificate
          Scrutiny Committee, Nashik
          Division, Nashik Committee
          No.1, Nashik.

          3. The Divisional Commissioner,
          Nashik Division, Nashik.

          4. The Additional Collector,
          Ahmednagar.

          5. The Tahsildar,
          Jamkhed, Tq.Jamkhed,
          Dist.Ahmednagar.                        ...Respondents.
                                           ...

          Mr.N.V.Gaware, advocate for the petitioner.
          Mr.P.S.Patil, Additional Government Pleader for
          the State.
                                   ...




::: Uploaded on - 06/11/2017                     ::: Downloaded on - 07/11/2017 01:24:52 :::
                                                2                        W.P.No.12524/16

                                   CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND
                                           SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI,JJ.

Date : 02.11.2017.

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S.V.Gangapurwala,J.)

1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing.

2. The petitioner is elected as a Member of the Village Panchayat from reserved category. On account of non-submission of validity certificate within a period of six (6) months as provided U/s 10-1A of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, the petitioner is disqualified. Mr.Gaware, learned counsel submits that subsequently the petitioner is issued the validity certificate.

3. The Full Bench of this Court in the case of "Anant H.Ulahalkar and another Vs. Chief Election Commissioner and others" reported in 2017 (1) Mh.L.J. 431, had held that provisions of Section 10-1A of Maharashtra Village Panchayats ::: Uploaded on - 06/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 07/11/2017 01:24:52 ::: 3 W.P.No.12524/16 Act, to be mandatory and the said judgment is stayed by the Apex Court in Special Leave to Appeal Nos.29874-29875 of 2016.

4. In light of that, the impugned order is quashed and set aside. The Respondent-authority is at liberty to take further course of action depending upon the judgment that would be delivered by the Apex Court in the above referred matters.

5. Rule accordingly made absolute in above terms. No costs.

                             Sd/-                              Sd/-

          (SMT.VIBHA KANKANWADI,J.)                  (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)



          asp/office/wp12524.16




::: Uploaded on - 06/11/2017                          ::: Downloaded on - 07/11/2017 01:24:52 :::
                                4                 W.P.No.12524/16




::: Uploaded on - 06/11/2017       ::: Downloaded on - 07/11/2017 01:24:52 :::