jdk 1 9.crwp.3005.17.j.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3005 OF 2017
Umesh Gajanan Patil ]
C-7234, Nashik Road Central Prison, ].. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ].. Respondent
....
Ms. Rohini M. Dandekar Advocate appointed for Petitioner
Mrs. G.P. Mulekar A.P.P. for the State
....
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND
M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
DATED : NOVEMBER 02, 2017 ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]:
1 Heard both sides. 2 By judgment and order dated 17.9.2002, learned
Additional Sessions Judge, Pune convicted the petitioner along with other accused for the offence under Sections 376(2)(g), 377 and 323 read with Section 34 of IPC. The petitioner was sentenced to suffer R.I. for life and fine of Rs. 5000/- under Section 376(2)(g) of IPC and imprisonment for ten years for the offence under Section 377 read with Section 34 of IPC. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
1 of 2
::: Uploaded on - 03/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2017 01:43:40 :::
jdk 2 9.crwp.3005.17.j.doc
3 The grievance of the petitioner is that though he has
completed 14 years of actual imprisonment, his case for pre- mature release has not yet been decided by the Government. In view of the grievance of the petitioner, the Home Department, Govt. of Maharashtra, Mumbai which is the concerned department, to take a decision in the case of the petitioner for pre-mature release within a period of eight weeks from today.
4 Mr. Sandeep S. Kamble Under Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai who is present in the Court, undertakes to communicate this order to the Home Department.
5 With the above observation, Rule is made absolute in above terms. Petition is disposed of. [ M.S.KARNIK, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] kandarkar 2 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 03/11/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2017 01:43:40 :::