Papiya @ Simran W/O Bikramjeet ... vs Bikramjeet Singh S/O Karnail ...

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 1362 Bom
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2017

Bombay High Court
Papiya @ Simran W/O Bikramjeet ... vs Bikramjeet Singh S/O Karnail ... on 31 March, 2017
Bench: V.A. Naik
 3103FCA195.14-Judgment                                                                         1/2


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

                 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.  195  OF    2014
                                  AND
                  CIVIL APPLICATION (O) NO. 446 OF 2017

 APPELLANT :-                         Papiya  @  Simran  W/o   Bikramjeet   Singh
 (On.R.A.)                            Auluck,   Aged   about   38   yrs.,   Occu.   Service,
                                      R/o:   C/o   Mrs.Anjali   Bhattacharjee,   7/73/6,
                                      Type   II   Quarters,   O.F.   Ambazari,   Defense
                                      Estate, Nagpur-21.  

                                         ...VERSUS... 

 RESPONDENT :-                        Bikramjeet Singh S/o Karnail Singh Auluck
 (On.R.A.)                            Aged about 40 yrs., Occ: Service, R/o: 46,
                                      New   Prgatisheel   Apartments,   Vasundhara
                                      Enclave, DELHI-96. 

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Mrs. R.S.Sirpurkar, counsel for the appellant.
                    Mr. B. D. Pandit, counsel for the respondent.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                        CORAM : SMT. VASANTI    A    NAIK & 
                                                    MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI
                                                                     ,   JJ.

DATED : 31.03.2017 O R A L J U D G M E N T (Per Smt.Vasanti A Naik, J.) By this family court appeal, the appellant-wife had challenged the judgment of the Family Court, rejecting the prayer made by the appellant-wife for grant of a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty.

During the pendency of the family court appeal, the parties had agreed to appear before the mediator to explore the possibility of an ::: Uploaded on - 06/04/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 07/04/2017 00:25:21 ::: 3103FCA195.14-Judgment 2/2 amicable settlement. The parties appeared before the mediator and the mediation was successful. The parties entered into an agreement dated 30/03/2017. The agreement was reduced into writing on the said date and the agreement was signed by the parties as well as their counsel in the presence of the mediator, who had also signed the agreement.

The parties are personally present in the court today. The parties state that they are ad idem on the terms mentioned in the agreement dated 30/03/2017. They state that the marriage solemnized between them on 09/02/2001 should be dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent.

We have perused the terms of the agreement dated 30/03/2017 which is a part of the record. The terms are just and reasonable. Hence, the marriage solemnized between the parties on 09/02/2001 stands dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent under section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The family court appeal and the civil application are disposed of with no order as to costs. A decree be drawn accordingly.

                        JUDGE                                              JUDGE 


 KHUNTE




::: Uploaded on - 06/04/2017                                ::: Downloaded on - 07/04/2017 00:25:21 :::