wp6429.13.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.6429/2013
PETITIONER : Madhav s/o Natthuji Dharne
Aged about 58 years, Occu. Retired,
R/o Parijat Society, Wadgaon, Yavatmal.
...VERSUS...
RESPONDENTS : 1. The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate
Scrutiny Committee, Irvin Chowk, Amravati,
through Secretary/Vice-Chairman.
2. The Deputy Director of Land Records,
Amravati Division, Amravati.
3. The Superintendent of Land Records,
Yavatmal.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mrs. P.D. Rane, Advocate for petitioner
Shri K.L. Dharmadhikari, AGP for respondents
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND
ARUN D. UPADHYE, JJ.
DATE : 21.06.2017 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J.) By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order of his reversion and has also sought a direction to the Scrutiny Committee to decide his caste claim within a time-frame.
::: Uploaded on - 22/06/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 23/06/2017 00:49:06 :::
wp6429.13.odt 2 During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has expired. The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that though she had contacted the legal representatives of the petitioner, till date the legal representatives have not approached her for prosecuting the writ petition by substituting their names in place of the deceased petitioner on record.
In view of the fact that the petitioner has expired and his legal representatives are not brought on record till date, the petition would abate. The writ petition is therefore disposed of with no order as to costs. Rule stands discharged.
JUDGE JUDGE
Wadkar
::: Uploaded on - 22/06/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 23/06/2017 00:49:06 :::