Shri Janardan Zungaji Gatade vs The Panel Board And Laminates Ltd. ...

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 4266 Bom
Judgement Date : 10 July, 2017

Bombay High Court
Shri Janardan Zungaji Gatade vs The Panel Board And Laminates Ltd. ... on 10 July, 2017
Bench: I.K. Jain
wp.5432.16.jud                           1


  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
            NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

                     WRIT PETITION NO.5432 OF 2016


Shri Janardan Zungaji Gatade,
Aged about 56 years, Occupation : Nil,
R/o at Post Visapur, Ward No.5,
Tahsil : Ballarpur, District Chandrapur.                               .... Petitioner

       -- Versus -

The Panel Board & Laminates Ltd. Co.,
Unit at Visapur, Tahsil Ballarpur,
District Chandrapur, through its
Authorized Signatory.                                              .... Respondent


Shri F.G. Isaac, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri V.M. Dewalkar, Advocate for the Respondent.

                CORAM           : KUM. INDIRA JAIN, J.
                DATE            : JULY 10, 2017.


ORAL JUDGMENT :-


                Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally

with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.


02]             Challenge in this petition is against the common

judgment and order dated 11/07/2016 passed by the Industrial

Court, Chandrapur allowing the revision applications preferred by

petitioner and respondent and remanding the matter to the




 ::: Uploaded on - 21/07/2017                      ::: Downloaded on - 28/08/2017 09:46:44 :::
 wp.5432.16.jud                      2


Labour Court for fresh trial on the issue of quantum of

compensation by giving both the parties opportunity as per the

law.


03]             Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. With their

assistance, this Court has gone through the impugned order

passed by the Industrial Court. It can be seen from the reasons

recorded that the Industrial Court has considered only one of the

grievances relating to quantum of compensation. Perusal of

revision applications preferred by petitioner and respondent

before the Industrial Court would reveal that the principal

grievance of petitioner was regarding denial of continuity in

service and the consequential benefits, whereas respondent

challenged the judgment and order passed by the Labour Court

on the ground that enquiry was properly conducted and

complainant had not proved violation of principles of natural

justice.      There is no whisper in the entire order regarding the

same.


04]             As Industrial Court has not considered the principal

grounds raised in the revision applications, it is essential to

remand the matter to the Industrial Court for fresh decision in




 ::: Uploaded on - 21/07/2017              ::: Downloaded on - 28/08/2017 09:46:44 :::
 wp.5432.16.jud                                3


accordance with the law. Hence, the following order :


                                          ORDER

I. Writ Petition No.5432/2016 is partly allowed. II. Impugned common judgment and order dated 11/07/2016 in Revision (ULP) Nos.54/2014 and 79/2014 is quashed and set aside. III. Matter is remanded to the Industrial Court, Chandrapur for fresh decision in accordance with the law.

IV. Parties to appear before the Industrial Court, Chandrapur on 24th July, 2017. V. Writ petition stands disposed of. VI. Rule is made absolute in above terms. VII. No costs.

*sdw                                                   (Kum. Indira Jain, J.)




 ::: Uploaded on - 21/07/2017                             ::: Downloaded on - 28/08/2017 09:46:44 :::