3. cri wp 4770-17.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4770 OF 2017
Sanjay Khanderao Wadane .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
...................
Appearances
Ms. Rohini M. Dandekar Advocate (appointed) for the Petitioner
Mr. Arfan Sait APP for the State
...................
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, Acting C.J. &
M.S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : DECEMBER 13, 2017.
ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, A.C.J.] :
1. Heard both sides.
2. The petitioner preferred an application for parole on 25.1.2016. The said application was granted by order dated 26.4.2016. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner was released on parole for a period of 30 days i.e from 31.5.2016 to 29.6.2016. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred his first application for extension of parole for a period of 30 days.
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
::: Uploaded on - 14/12/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 15/12/2017 02:01:38 :::
3. cri wp 4770-17.doc
The said application was granted and parole was extended till 29.7.2016. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred second application for extension of parole on 22.7.2016. The said application was rejected by order dated 2.8.2016. Being aggrieved thereby, the petitioner has preferred the present petition.
3. Against the order of rejection of an application for extension of parole, remedy of appeal has been provided. It is seen that the petitioner has not exhausted that remedy and and has directly preferred this writ petition, hence, we are not inclined to interfere. The petitioner is relegated to the remedy of preferring an appeal against the order of rejection dated 2.8.2016, hence, Rule is discharged.
[ M.S. KARNIK, J ] [ ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2
::: Uploaded on - 14/12/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 15/12/2017 02:01:38 :::