lpa435.09 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 435 OF 2009
IN
WRIT PETITION NOS. 4516 AND 4375 OF 1999
1. Shri Siddartha Shivdas Ramteke
aged about 40 years, occupation
Teacher, r/o Masal Meta, Tq.
Sakoli, District - Bhandara.
2. Shri Mehaboob Ramzan Turak
aged about 35 years, occupation
Teacher, r/o Pohara, Tq. Sakoli,
District - Bhandara. ... APPELLANTS
Versus
1. Panchasheel Education Society,
Ghanod, bearing registration No.
1178, thr. its Joint Secretary Shri
Bhaurao Namdeorao Meshram,
Amgaon (B.K.), Tq. Sakoli,
District - Bhandara.
2. Head Master,
Namdeorao High School, Ghanod
Tq. Sakoli, District - Bhandara.
3. The Education Officer (Secondary),
Zilla Parishad, Bhandara. ... RESPONDENTS
Shri A.R. Patil, Advocate for the appellants.
Shri A.Z. Jibhkate, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
Shri H.R. Dhumale, AGP for respondent Nos. 3.
.....
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI &
MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
DECEMBER 07, 2017.
::: Uploaded on - 08/12/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 10/12/2017 01:46:25 ::: lpa435.09 2 ORAL JUDGMENT : (PER B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) The appellants Siddartha Shivdas Ramteke and Mehaboob Ramzan Turak, challenge the common judgment delivered by the learned Single on 02.03.2009 in Writ Petition Nos. 3835 of 1999, 4516 of 1999 and 4375 of 1999. They were respondent No. 1 respectively in Writ Petition Nos. 4516 of 1999 and 4375 of 1999.
2. We have heard Shri Patil, learned counsel for the appellants, Shri Jibhkate, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and Shri Dhumale, learned AGP for respondent No. 3.
3. It is not in dispute that respondent No. 1 in Writ Petition No. 3835 of 1999 viz., Dilip s/o Namdeo Wasnik filed LPA No. 146 of 2010 and this Bench has on 09.11.2017 dismissed it. Thus, the judgment dated 02.03.2009 delivered by the learned Single Judge is already maintained by us in LPA No. 146 of 2010.
4. Therefore, for the reasons given in the said ::: Uploaded on - 08/12/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 10/12/2017 01:46:25 ::: lpa435.09 3 judgment dated 09.11.2017, present Letters Patent Appeal is also dismissed. Rule discharged. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
******
*GS.
::: Uploaded on - 08/12/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 10/12/2017 01:46:25 :::