501-WP-4125-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4125 OF 2016
MRS.SAMIKSHA BAPU DHURI )...PETITIONER
V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. )...RESPONDENTS
Ms.Bhakti Jogal, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr.Vinod Chate, APP for the Respondent - State.
Mr.Bharat Gavande, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J.
DATE : 16th AUGUST 2017 P.C. : 1 Not on board. Taken on board, on being mentioned for production. 2 The learned advocate appearing for the respondent
vehemently opposed for continuation of the interim relief. However, it is to be noted that as regular court is not available, this court is in-charge of the matter for today only.
avk 1/2
::: Uploaded on - 18/08/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 28/08/2018 16:04:24 :::
501-WP-4125-2016.doc
2 It is seen that interim oder is holding the field since 2nd
December 2016. The learned advocate appearing for the respondent is contending that the petitioner is taking undue advantage of the interim order by making encroachment on other property. This will have to be determined on hearing the petition. Today, the matter is before this court only for extension of the interim order.
3 The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petition may be kept after Ganesh Festival. As the petitioner is enjoying the interim order, such request cannot be acceded, particularly when the learned advocate for the respondent against whom the interim order is operating, is opposing long adjournment.
4 Hence, stand over to 21st August 2017.
Interim order to continue till then.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
avk 2/2
::: Uploaded on - 18/08/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 28/08/2018 16:04:24 :::