5. cri appa 623-17.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 623 OF 2017
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 44 OF 2017
Mohd. Naushad Ayub Shaikh .. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
...................
Appearances
Mr. Khan Fakhruddin Advocate for the Applicant
Mr. H.J. Dedia APP for the State
...................
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 27, 2017.
ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :
1. Heard both sides.
2. The applicant - original accused No. 2 has been
convicted under Section 302 r/w 34 of IPC. The applicant is
now seeking bail.
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 3
::: Uploaded on - 28/04/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 29/04/2017 00:35:02 :::
5. cri appa 623-17.doc
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the
case of the applicant stands on the same footing as that of
original accused No. 3 Abdul Jabbar Majid Shaikh who has
been granted bail by this Court by order dated 22.2.2017 in
Criminal Bail Application No. 188 of 2017. The statement
that the case of the applicant stands on the same footing as
that of original accused No. 3 is not controverted by the
prosecution. In this view of the matter, we are inclined to
grant bail to the applicant. Hence, we proceed to pass the
following order:-
ORDER
i. The applicant to be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 25000/- [ Rs. Twenty Five Thousand ] with one or two sureties to make up the said amount and P.R. Bond in like amount.
ii. During the period that the applicant is on bail, he shall report to Azad Maidan Police Station on first Sunday of every alternate week till disposal of the appeal.
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 3 ::: Uploaded on - 28/04/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 29/04/2017 00:35:02 :::
5. cri appa 623-17.doc
4. The application is allowed in the above terms.
[ M.S. KARNIK, J. ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 3 of 3
::: Uploaded on - 28/04/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 29/04/2017 00:35:02 :::