0704WP4969.11-Judgment 1/6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 4969 OF 2011
PETITIONERS :- 1. State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary,
to Government of Maharashtra, Public
Health Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai -
400 032.
2. Director, Public Health Department, Saint
George Hospital, Mumbai.
3. Dy. Director of Health Services, Akola Circle,
Akola.
...VERSUS...
RESPONDENTS :- 1. Dr. Jyotsna Shamrao Potpite, Aged about 33
Org. Applicant years, Medical Officer, P.H.C. Talegaon
Thakur, Tq. Teosa, Dist. Amaravati.
Org.Respt.No.4 2. Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad,
Amravati.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mrs. K. Joshi, Addl. Govt.Pleader for the petitioners.
Mr.C.V.Kale, counsel for the respondent No.1.
Ms S.Dashputre, counsel h/f Mr.P.B.Patil, counsel for
the respondent No.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK &
MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI
, JJ.
DATED : 07.04.2017 ::: Uploaded on - 13/04/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 14/04/2017 00:24:51 ::: 0704WP4969.11-Judgment 2/6 O R A L J U D G M E N T (Per Smt.Vasanti A Naik, J.) By this writ petition, the State of Maharashtra and others challenge the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 31/03/2010, allowing an original application filed by the respondent No.1 and directing the petitioners to grant the increment to the respondent No.1 on completion of one year of service and continue to grant the same to the respondent No.1 till she is continued in service.
2. According to the respondent No.1, who had filed an original application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, in view of the bond furnished by her at the time of securing admission to the post graduation medical course, she was appointed as a medical officer on ad hoc basis on 25/01/2000. The services of the respondent No.1 were continued from time to time on ad hoc basis and she claimed to have worked with the petitioners as an ad hoc medical officer till she filed the original application in the year 2005. Since the respondent No.1 was not granted increment after the completion of one year of service and also further increments, the petitioner prayed in the original application that a direction be issued to the petitioners to grant the annual increment to the respondent No.1 after the completion of one year and thereafter during every year, while she was in service. The tribunal, by considering the orders passed by it in some other original ::: Uploaded on - 13/04/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 14/04/2017 00:24:51 ::: 0704WP4969.11-Judgment 3/6 applications granted the relief in favour of the respondent No.1 and directed the State Government to grant annual increment to the respondents after completion of one year of service and to grant her annual increments regularly till she was in service.
3. Mrs.Joshi, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the petitioners, submitted that the tribunal was not justified in directing the petitioners to grant annual increments to the respondent No.1 on completion of one year of service on ad hoc basis. It is submitted that the respondent No.1 was appointed only for a period of four months or till a candidate selected by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission was appointed by the petitioners on the post of medical officer, whichever was earlier. It is submitted that there was a break in the services of the respondent No.1 on each of the occasions, when a fresh appointment order was granted. It is stated that the Full Bench of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal has held in the order dated 03/03/2010 in Original Application No.240 of 2009 and others that an employee, who is not appointed on regular basis and is continued on ad hoc basis from time to time would not be entitled to yearly increments. It is stated that it is well settled that only an employee appointed on regular basis would be entitled to increments after each year of service.
::: Uploaded on - 13/04/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 14/04/2017 00:24:51 :::
0704WP4969.11-Judgment 4/6
4. Shri Kale, the learned counsel for the respondent No.1, supported the order of the tribunal. It is submitted that the respondent No.1 was appointed as a bonded candidate on the post of medical officer and though there was an artificial break in the services, the respondent No.1 has in all worked for a period of nearly ten years as a medical officer on ad hoc basis. It is submitted that the orders passed by the tribunal in several other original applications were relied on by the tribunal while granting the relief in favour of the respondent No.1. It is submitted that the Full Bench of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal has considered the cases of medical officers and lecturers that were not duly selected but the respondent No.1 was selected by duly constituted selection committee and her appointment is not irregular. It is submitted that when the relief is granted to several other employees that are similarly situated, the respondent No.1 cannot be left out.
5. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties, it appears that the tribunal was not justified in granting the relief in favour of the respondent No.1 solely on the basis of the orders passed in some other original applications. Probably, the order passed by the Full Bench of the tribunal on 31/03/2010, was not brought to the notice of the tribunal when the tribunal decided the matter in the original application ::: Uploaded on - 13/04/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 14/04/2017 00:24:51 ::: 0704WP4969.11-Judgment 5/6 filed by the respondent No.1 on 31/03/2010. The tribunal, therefore, wrongly relied on the decisions that were rendered by the Bench of Two Presiding Officers of the Tribunal, without considering the decision rendered by a Bench comprising of the Three Presiding Officers of the tribunal. The appointment order of the respondent No.1 is placed on record. The appointment order clearly shows that the respondent No.1 was appointed on ad hoc basis only for a period of four months or till a candidate selected by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission was appointed by the petitioners on the post of the medical officer, whichever was earlier. The appointment order of the respondent No.1 clearly shows that the respondent No.1 was not even appointed for a period of four months and her appointment could have come to an end if a duly selected candidate was appointed by the recommendations of the Maharashtra Public Service Commission on the post she was holding. Merely because the respondent No.1 continued to serve as a medical officer, the tribunal could not have directed the petitioners to condone the break in the services of the respondent No.1 and grant her annual increments. Had the services of the respondent No.1 regularised from the date on which she was appointed, the respondent No.1 may have been entitled to claim the increments after the end of each year of service. However, it appears that the services of the respondent No.1 were not regularised till her services were terminated. The appointment ::: Uploaded on - 13/04/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 14/04/2017 00:24:51 ::: 0704WP4969.11-Judgment 6/6 of the respondent No.1 was on temporary and ad hoc basis and the respondent No.1 was therefore not entitled to claim yearly increments, solely because she was permitted to continue from time to time as a medical officer on ad hoc basis. It is well settled that only regular employees would be entitled to increments and the other benefits to which they are entitled to. We find that the tribunal has committed a serious error in allowing the original application and directing the petitioners to release the increments in favour of the respondent No.1.
6. Hence, for the reasons aforesaid, the writ petition is allowed. The impugned order is quashed and set aside. The original application filed by the respondent No.1 stands dismissed. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
KHUNTE
::: Uploaded on - 13/04/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 14/04/2017 00:24:51 :::