Nandkumar Kundlik Wagh And ... vs The Union Of India And Others

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6346 Bom
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2016

Bombay High Court
Nandkumar Kundlik Wagh And ... vs The Union Of India And Others on 25 October, 2016
Bench: S.V. Gangapurwala
                                                                                  913.odt
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          WRIT PETITION NO. 4703 OF 2016




                                                                           
    1. Nandkumar s/o Kundlik Wagh
       Age 59 years, Occu: Agri




                                                   
       R/o Adul (Kh), Tq. Paithan
       Dist. Aurangabad.

    2. Satish s/o Nandkumar Wagh                        ... Petitioners 




                                                  
       Age 30 years, Occu: Agri
       R/o Adul (Kh), Tq. Paithan
       Dist. Aurangabad.




                                            
        VERSUS

    1.  Union of India         
        Through Its Secretary,
        Ministry of Road Transport and 
        Highways, New Delhi
                              
    2. Project Director,
       Project Implementation Unit,
       B-23, Kamgar Chowk,
      

       CIDCO, N-4, aurangabad 431 003
   



    3. The Competent Authority (Land 
       Acquisition)
       Indian National Highway No.211
       Deputy Colelctor, Land 





       Acquisition, Krushna Khore Vikas 
       Mahamandal, Aurangabad.

    4. The State of Maharashtra,                        ... Respondents.
       Through its Principal Secretary,





       Public Works Department, 
       Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032

    Mr. S. S. Tope, Advocate for the petitioner,
    Mr. S. B. Talekar, Advocate for respondent NO.2,
    Mr. B. V.Virdhe, AGP for respondent No.4,

                                     CORAM   :  S. V. GANGAPURWALA & 
                                                 K. L. WADANE, JJ.
                                      DATE   :   25th October,  2016

                                                                                        1/4
      ::: Uploaded on - 27/10/2016                 ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2016 00:49:07 :::
                                                                               913.odt
    JUDGMENT (Per S.V. Gangapurwala, J):                    

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal

2. Mr. Tope, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the land of the petitioners was acquired under the award dated 01.09.2014.

Compensation is awarded, however, not in accordance with the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The said Act of 2013 has been made applicable to the acquisition under the National Highways Act pursuant to Circular dated 03.02.2016 from 01.01.2015 and if compensation is not paid prior to 31.12.2014, though the award is passed prior to the said date, compensation is required to be paid as per the new Act of 2013.

3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, compensation was paid to the petitioners on 28.01.2015 by R.T.G.S. in the accounts of the petitioners. The learned counsel submits that even the Highways Authority has taken a decision on 28.09.2016 to award compensation as per the Act of 2013.

2/4 ::: Uploaded on - 27/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2016 00:49:07 :::

913.odt

4. Mr. Talekar, the learned counsel for the respondent National Highways Authority submits that on 01.11.2014, the Competent Authority (Acquisition) had directed to the petitioners to submit account particulars and the documents for depositing the amount. The same was much prior to 31.12.2014. It was delay on the part of the petitioners in forwarding the documents and information as solicited by letter dated 1.11.2014. As such, the compensation is rightly paid.

5. We have heard the learned AGP also.

6. We have gone through the affidavit in reply filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer. The Special Land Acquisition Officer has categorically admitted in his affidavit in reply that the petitioners are entitled for the compensation as per the Act of 2013 and the same is required to be done.

7. We need not go into other aspects of the matter in view of the letter dated 28.09.2016 issued by the National Highways Authority, whereby, it has taken a decision to grant escalation in the amount of compensation awarded. The award pursuant to which the land of the petitioners is acquired is also included in the same. The said letter is placed on record by the 3/4 ::: Uploaded on - 27/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2016 00:49:07 :::

913.odt petitioners. As the National Highways Authority has taken a decision to grant escalation in compensation as per the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, we need not debate into the merits of the contentions.

8. The amount has been deposited as per the award dated 01.09.2014 in the accounts of the petitioners on 28.01.2015.

9. Considering the aforesaid conspectus of the matter, the respondents shall calculate the compensation as per the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in respect of the award dated 01.09.2014 with regard to the land of the petitioners.

The said exercise shall be done expeditiously, preferably within six months from today and the amount be paid to the petitioners.

10. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No costs.

(K. L. WADANE, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) JPC 4/4 ::: Uploaded on - 27/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2016 00:49:07 :::