Baburao Kashiram Korde And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6178 Bom
Judgement Date : 19 October, 2016

Bombay High Court
Baburao Kashiram Korde And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 19 October, 2016
Bench: R.M. Borde
                                       {1}
                                                                 wp895916.odt

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY




                                                                     
                           BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                        WRIT PETITION NO.8959 OF 2016 




                                             
     01 Baburao Kashiram Korde,
          age: 43 years, Occ: Agri.,
          R/o At/Post Navalghavaon,
          Tq. & District Hingoli.




                                            
     02 Kashiram Devba Korde,
          age: 72 years, Occ: Agri.,
          R/o At/Post Navalghavaon,
          Tq. & District Hingoli.




                                      
     03 Saraswati Ananda Korde,
                             
          age: 61 years, Occ: Agri.,
          R/o At/Post Navalghavaon,
          Tq. & District Hingoli.
                            
     04 Gajanan Nivrati Padghan,
          age: 35 years, Occ: Agri.,
          R/o At/Post Navalghavaon,
          Tq. & District Hingoli.
      


     05 Shamrao Aappaji Padghan,
   



          age: 68 years, Occ: Agri.,
          R/o At/Post Navalghavaon,
          Tq. & District Hingoli.

     06 Ananda Pandurang Tapre,





          age: 50 years, Occ: Agri.,
          R/o Santmba, Post: Bhandegaon,
          Tq. & District Hingoli.

     07 Ramesh Pandurang Tapre,





          age: 50 years, Occ: Agri.,
          R/o Santmba, Post: Bhandegaon,
          Tq. & District Hingoli.

     08 Kailas Purbha Tapase,
          age: 33 years, Occ: Agri.,
          R/o Santmba, Post: Bhandegaon,
          Tq. & District Hingoli.




    ::: Uploaded on - 25/10/2016             ::: Downloaded on - 26/10/2016 00:16:13 :::
                                      {2}
                                                                wp895916.odt

     09 Bhagawat Kashinath Ghyar,




                                                                    
          age: 30 years, Occ: Agri.,
          R/o Santmba, Post: Bhandegaon,
          Tq. & District Hingoli.




                                            
     10  Datta Hausaji Ghyar,
           age: 55 years, Occ: Agri.,
           R/o Santmba, Post: Bhandegaon,




                                           
           Tq. & District Hingoli.

     11  Namdeo Hausaji Ghyar,
          age: 52 years, Occ: Agri.,
          R/o Santmba, Post: Bhandegaon,




                                  
          Tq. & District Hingoli.

     12 Shivaji Yogaji Ghyar, 
                             
          age: 45 years, Occ: Agri.,
          R/o Santmba, Post: Bhandegaon,
          Tq. & District Hingoli.
                            
     13 Kautika Rayaji Ghyar,     
          age: 55 years, Occ: Agri.,
          R/o Santmba, Post: Bhandegaon,
      

          Tq. & District Hingoli.
      
   



     14  Kailas Bhojaji Ghyar,
           age: 46 years, Occ: Agri.,
           R/o Santmba, Post: Bhandegaon,
           Tq. & District Hingoli.





     15  Manjulabai Gangaram Ghyar,
          age: 60 years, Occ: Agri.,
          R/o Santmba, Post: Bhandegaon,
          Tq. & District Hingoli.





     16 Laxmibai Govinda Ghyar, 
          age: 55 years, Occ: Agri.,
          R/o Santmba, Post: Bhandegaon,
          Tq. & District Hingoli.

     17 Swaraj Bhojaji Ghyar,    
          age: 52 years, Occ: Agri.,
          R/o Santmba, Post: Bhandegaon,
          Tq. & District Hingoli.




    ::: Uploaded on - 25/10/2016            ::: Downloaded on - 26/10/2016 00:16:13 :::
                                            {3}
                                                                      wp895916.odt

     18  Hanuman Balaji Ghyar,




                                                                          
           age: 19 years, Occ: Agri.,
           R/o Santmba, Post: Bhandegaon,
           Tq. & District Hingoli.




                                                  
     19  Bharat Maroti Ghyar,
          age: 47 years, Occ: Agri.,
          R/o Santmba, Post: Bhandegaon,




                                                 
          Tq. & District Hingoli.                          Petitioners

              Versus

     01 The State of Maharashtra,




                                        
          through its Secretary,
          Irrigation Development Department,
          Mantralaya, Mumbai.
                             
     02 The District Collector,
          Hingoli, District Hingoli.
                            
     03 The Sub Divisional Officer,
          Land Acquisition Officer,
          Hingoli, District Hingoli.
      


     04 The Executive Engineer,
   



          Minor Irrigation Division, Parbhani,
          Jayakwadi Colony, Koregaon Road,
          Tq. & District Parbhani.

     05 The Sub Divisional Engineer,





          Minor Irrigation Division, 
          Shivajinagar, Near Water Tank,
          Hingoli.                                         Respondents

Mr.D.K.Thote, advocate for petitioners. Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.P.S.Patil, advocate for Respondents No.4 & 5.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8960 OF 2016 01 Mahadu Ranbhaji Jagtap, age: 51 years, Occ: Agri., ::: Uploaded on - 25/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 26/10/2016 00:16:13 ::: {4} wp895916.odt R/o At/Post Bhandegaon, Tq. & District Hingoli.

02 Sunil Nagorao Jagtap, age: 36 years, Occ: Agri., R/o At/Post Bhandegaon, Tq. & District Hingoli.

03 Hari @ Baban Rama Jagtap, age: 42 years, Occ: Agri., R/o At/Post Bhandegaon, Tq. & District Hingoli.

04 Namdev Gyanuji Jagtap, age: 70 years, Occ: Agri., R/o At/Post Bhandegaon, Tq. & District Hingoli.

05 Santabai Narayan Shinde, age: 55 years, Occ: Agri., R/o At/Post Ganeshwadi, Tq. & District Hingoli. Petitioners Versus 01 The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Irrigation Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

02 The District Collector, Hingoli, District Hingoli.

03 The Sub Divisional Officer, Land Acquisition Officer, Hingoli, District Hingoli.

04 The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Parbhani, Jayakwadi Colony, Koregaon Road, Tq. & District Parbhani.

::: Uploaded on - 25/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 26/10/2016 00:16:13 :::

{5} wp895916.odt 05 The Sub Divisional Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Shivajinagar, Near Water Tank, Hingoli. Respondents Mr.D.K.Thote, advocate for petitioners. Mr.P.S.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 3.

CORAM : R.M.BORDE & K.K.SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 19th October, 2016 ORAL JUDGMENT : ( PER R.M. BORDE, J.)

1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and the petition is taken up for final disposal by consent of learned counsel for the respective parties.

3. The petitioners are objecting to the award passed by the Land Acquisition Officer on 07.04.2015, determining the amount of compensation, in respect of the acquired property. The award has been passed in respect of the land, situated in rural area by consideration of multiplier factor of 1:1. In view of the judgment delivered by this Court in Writ Petition No. 4274/2016 and in pursuance to the Notification issued by the Government on ::: Uploaded on - 25/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 26/10/2016 00:16:13 ::: {6} wp895916.odt 26.05.2015, the acquisition authorities are required to apply multiplier as 2 in respect of the properties situated in rural areas.

4. In view of above, the award passed by the land acquisition authorities needs to be corrected so far as the computation of amount of compensation is concerned. The respondents are thus directed t determine the amount of compensation payable to the petitioners by prescription of multiplier factor 2 and declare the award afresh and pay the amount of compensation to the petitioners expeditiously.

5. The respondents are directed to determine the amount of compensation under the award in observance of the directions as above, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks from today and, it is accordingly directed.

6. Rule is made absolute accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

               K.K.SONAWANE                               R.M.BORDE
                   JUDGE                                     JUDGE
     dyb
                                               




    ::: Uploaded on - 25/10/2016                        ::: Downloaded on - 26/10/2016 00:16:13 :::