Arwez Zakir Shaikh vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6135 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2016

Bombay High Court
Arwez Zakir Shaikh vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 18 October, 2016
Bench: S.V. Gangapurwala
                                                                                          31.odt
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                             BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                           31 WRIT PETITION NO. 10221 OF 2016




                                                                                  
                                                 
           Arwez  s/o  Zakir Shaikh                        ..  Petitioner 




                                                          
           Age 18 years, Occu: Student,
           R/o At Post Shahagad, Tq. 
           Ambad, Dist. Jalna,

           VERSUS




                                                         
    1. The State of Maharashtra,
       Through  the Secretary,
       Tribal Development Department,




                                               
       Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032

                                  
    2. The Scheduled Caste, Vimukta 
       Jati Nomadic Tribes, Other 
       Backward Classes and Special 
                                 
       Backward Classes Caste 
       Certificate Scrutiny Committee 
       No.1, Aurangabad Region, 
       Aurangabad, through its Member 
       Secretary.
      
   



    3. The Sub Divisional Officer,                         ...  Repsondents.
       Jalna.

    Mr.   Amol   Chalak   i/by   Talekar   and   Associates,   Advocate 





    for the petitioner. 
    Mrs. M. A. Deshpande, AGP for respondents 1 to 3

                                        CORAM       :  S. V. GANGAPURWALA & 
                                                        K. L. WADANE, JJ.





                                         DATE       :   18th October,  2016


    JUDGMENT:                             

1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of parties, the petition is taken up for final 1/4 ::: Uploaded on - 20/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 21/10/2016 00:52:47 :::

31.odt disposal

3. The petitioner had applied for caste certificate as belonging to Chhapparband, Vimukta Jati. The learned Sub Divisional Officer, Jalna rejected the said application. The petitioner filed an appeal before the Scrutiny Committee. The Scrutiny Committee dismissed the appeal. Aggrieved thereby, the present petition.

4. Mr. Chalak, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Committee has rejected the application seeking caste certificate of the petitioner as belonging to Chhapparband, Vimukta Jati solely on the ground that no documents prior to 1961 are produced on record. The learned counsel submits that the document of Nikahanama of the grandfather of the petitioner was produced on record, the same is of the year 1961. So also, Nikahanama of the father of the petitioner is also produced on record, it is of the year 1991 stating the caste Chhapparband. The learned counsel submits that apart from the aforesaid documents, there are other documents produced on record showing caste Chhapparband, such as school record of the petitioner so also school record of brother of the petitioner showing caste as Chapparband. School record 2/4 ::: Uploaded on - 20/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 21/10/2016 00:52:47 :::

31.odt of the petitioner's father and uncle show the caste as Muslim. According to the learned counsel, there is no contra evidence on record. Even the Vigilance has found the said record to be genuine.

5. The learned AGP submits that since the old documents prior to 1961 are not produced on record and the other documents are of recent origin, the Committee and Sub-Divisional Officer have rightly considered the entire evidence on record and have rightly rejected the application of the petitioner.

6. While entertaining the application seeking caste certificate, long-drawn enquiry is not contemplated. The competent authority has to be prima facie satisfied with the documents produced on record.

Prima facie, the vigilance has found the Nikahanama of the grandfather of the petitioner of the year 1961 showing caste as Chhapparband. Even Nikahnama of the year 1991 in respect of the father of the petitioner shows the caste as Chhaperband. The school record of the petitioner and his brother shows caste as Chhapparband. Entry of Muslim is the entry of religion and not of caste. Even otherwise, the caste certificate will have to undergo acid test of scrutiny 3/4 ::: Uploaded on - 20/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 21/10/2016 00:52:47 :::

31.odt at the time of seeking validity of the said caste certificate.

7. Considering the aforesaid evidence on record, there is no impediment to allow the petitioner's application seeking caste certificate. In the result we pass following order:

O R D E R i. Impugned order is quashed and set aside.

ii. Respondent No.3 shall issue caste certificate to the petitioner as belonging to Chhapparband, Vimukta Jati, expeditiously, preferably within two months from today.

iii. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No costs.

(K. L. WADANE, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) 4/4 ::: Uploaded on - 20/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 21/10/2016 00:52:47 :::