Chandrakant Kalnu Lathad vs Additional Commissioner, ...

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 5847 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 October, 2016

Bombay High Court
Chandrakant Kalnu Lathad vs Additional Commissioner, ... on 4 October, 2016
Bench: Ravi K. Deshpande
                                     1
                                                               wp5053.16.odt

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY




                                                                            
              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION




                                                    
                        Writ Petition No.5053 of 2016

    Chandrakant Kalnu Lathad,
    Aged 52 years,




                                                   
    Occupation - Agriculturist,
    R/o Chondi, Tq. Patur,
    Dist. Akola.                                    ... Petitioner/
                                                    Ori. Appellant




                                         
         Versus              
    1. Additional Commissioner,
       Amravati Division,
                            
       Amravati.

    2. Additional Collector,
       Akola.
      
   



    3. Sub-Divisional Officer,
       Balapur, Tq. Balapur,
       Dist. Akola.





    4. Ganesh Mahadeo Thakre,
       Age - about 55 years,
       Occupation - Agriculturist.





    5. Kishor Ganesh Thakre,
       Age - about 38 years,
       Occupation - Agriculturist.

         Both R/o Chondhi,




    ::: Uploaded on - 05/10/2016                    ::: Downloaded on - 06/10/2016 00:52:50 :::
                                        2
                                                                    wp5053.16.odt

            Tq. Patur, Dist. Akola.                      ... Respondents




                                                                                 
    Shri V.B. Bhise, Advocate for Petitioner.




                                                        
    Ms Geeta Tiwari, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
    Shri U.J. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5.




                                                       
                  Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J.

th Dated : 4 October, 2016 Oral Judgment :

1. Rule, made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the learned counsels appearing for the parties.

2. The learned counsels for the parties have invited my attention to Section 150 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, in support of their submission that where there is a serious dispute in respect of the title over the suit property, the entry is required to be made in the register of disputed cases. Hence, the authority concerned shall enter the property in the concerned disputed cases register maintained under Section 150 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The final decision thereon shall be taken after the finality of the decision in Regular Civil Suits No.42 of 2014 and 76 of 2014.

::: Uploaded on - 05/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 06/10/2016 00:52:50 ::: 3

wp5053.16.odt

2. The petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs.

Judge.

Lanjewar ::: Uploaded on - 05/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 06/10/2016 00:52:50 ::: 4 wp5053.16.odt CERTIFICATE "I certify that this Judgment uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Judgment."

Uploaded by : P.D. Lanjewar, PS Uploaded on : 5-10-2016 ::: Uploaded on - 05/10/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 06/10/2016 00:52:50 :::