wp2973.05 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2973 OF 2005
Dattatraya s/o Prabhakar Rajbinde
aged about 64 years, occupation -
Retired, r/o Chavadi Square,
Badnera Railway Station (Old city),
District - Amravati. ... PETITIONER
Versus
1. The Deputy Director of Education,
Amravati Division, Amravati
(for Maharashtra State).
2. Accountant General II of
Maharashtra, Nagpur.
3. The Head Master,
Ganeshdas Rathi High School &
Junior College, Amravati (run
by Shri Ganeshdas Rathi
Chhatralaya Samiti, Amravati) ... RESPONDENTS
Shri M.M. Ekre, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
.....
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI &
P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.
MAY 05, 2016.
ORAL JUDGMENT : (PER B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) Nobody for the petitioner even today. Yesterday, the matter was called out twice and passed over as there was no appearance either for the petitioner or for respondent No.3.
::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 30/07/2016 01:01:31 ::: wp2973.05 22. Shri M.M. Ekre, learned AGP has appeared on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. He has invited our attention to the reply affidavit to show that the petitioner retired after reaching the age of superannuation on 28.02.1999 and thereafter present petition has been filed belatedly in July 2005.
3. With the assistance of the learned AGP, we have perused the prayer clause (i) in the petition which shows an effort to seek condonation of break in service from 19.03.1973 to 08.07.1973. The petitioner has worked as Full Time Librarian from 01.09.1978 to 28.02.1999. Before that he worked as a Part Time Librarian with the very same employer from 09.07.1973 to 31.08.1973. Prior to this service, from 01.09.1971 to 18.03.1975, he has worked as Librarian with Suwalal Patni Arts and Commerce College at Pulgaon. Thus, after service with that College and till joining his last employer i.e. from 19.03.1973 to 08.07.1973, there is break in service.
The petitioner wants that ignoring this break, his service from 01.09.1971 should be recognized as continuous one.
::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 30/07/2016 01:01:31 ::: wp2973.05 34. The service rendered by the petitioner was on Part Time basis and the State Government has in reply affidavit specifically invited our attention to Rule 70.4 of the Maharashtra Secondary Schools Code, where Part Time employees are held not eligible either to Provident Fund Scheme or Pension scheme. Thus, Part Time service rendered by the petitioner is not valid for the purposes of computing his qualifying service. The State Government has filed its reply on 04.05.2006 and thereafter the petitioner has not challenged the validity of Rule 70.4 of the Maharashtra Secondary Schools Code.
5. We, therefore, find no substance in the present writ petition. It is accordingly dismissed. Rule discharged.
However, there shall be no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
******
*GS.
::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 30/07/2016 01:01:31 :::