Pankaj Omprakash Singh vs The State Of Maharashtra

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4802 Bom
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2016

Bombay High Court
Pankaj Omprakash Singh vs The State Of Maharashtra on 22 August, 2016
Bench: V.K. Tahilramani
                                                                                 9b. cri wp 5122-14.doc


RMA      
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION




                                                                                                
                          CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5122 OF 2014




                                                                        
            Pankaj Omprakash Singh                                       .. Petitioner

                                 Versus




                                                                       
            The State of Maharashtra                                     .. Respondent

                                                  ...................
            Appearances




                                                            
            Mr. Prosper D'Souza                    Advocate (appointed) for the Petitioner
            Mr. H.J. Dedia                     ig  APP for the State
                                                  ...................
                                             
                              CORAM       : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
                                              MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.

DATE : AUGUST 22, 2016.

ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :

1. Heard both sides.

2. Rule. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith.

3. In the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for furlough. The learned APP has brought to our notice a communication of the Superintendent of Nasik Road Central Prison where the petitioner was lodged. It states that in the jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 24/08/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 25/08/2016 00:22:02 ::: 9b. cri wp 5122-14.doc appeal preferred by the petitioner, he has been acquitted, hence, he has been released from prison. In this view of the matter, nothing survives in this petition, hence, rule is discharged.




                                                    
    [ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ]           [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]




                                          
                                    
                                   
      
   






    jfoanz vkacsjdj                                                         2 of 2


           ::: Uploaded on - 24/08/2016               ::: Downloaded on - 25/08/2016 00:22:02 :::