Smt. Zunkabai vs Smt. Kantaben

Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 85 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 December, 2009

Bombay High Court
Smt. Zunkabai vs Smt. Kantaben on 14 December, 2009
Bench: A. H. Joshi, A. R. Joshi
                                    1




                                                                
                                        
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY




                                       
                       NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
                   Writ Petition No.18 of 2000




                              
     1.   Smt. Zunkabai w/o late Shri
          Mangu Kumre,
          aged about 60 years,
                   
          Botheda,
          Post Ambeshivani,
          Tq. & Distt. Gadchiroli.
                  
     2.   Tulsiram s/o late Shri
          Mangu Kumre,
          aged about 27 years,
          resident of Botheda,
      

          Post Ambeshivani,
          Tq. & Distt. Gadchiroli.
   



     3.   Shri Motiram s/o late
          Mangu Kumre,
          aged about 35 years,
          Botheda,





          Post Ambeshivani,
          Tq. & Distt. Gadchiroli.

     4.   Smt. Shantabai w/o
          Shri Sakharam Tumareti,
          aged about 40 years,





          resident of Chandala,
          Post Bodali,
          Tah. & Distt.
          Gadchiroli.

     5.   Smt. Sakhubai w/o Shri
          Sakharam Pada,
          aged about 35 years,




                                        ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:24:40 :::
                                     2
          resident of Kanhalgaon,
          Post Mohali,




                                                                  
          Tq. Dhanora,
          Distt. Gadchiroli.




                                          
     6.   Smt. Phulvanti w/o
          Baburao Pada,
          aged about 30 years,
          resident of Sutgaon,




                                         
          Post Mendatola,
          Tq. Dhanora,
          Distt. Gadchiroli.

     7.   Shri Shriranga s/o




                                 
          late Shri Mangu Kumre,
          aged about 25 years,
                   
          resident of Mohali,
          Tq. Dhanora,
          Distt. Gadchiroli.
                  
     8.   Smt. Leela w/o Shri Kisan
          Pada,
          aged about 28 years,
          resident of Murumbodi,
          Post Ambeshivani,
      

          Tq. & Distt. Gadchiroli.         ....          Petitioners.
   



                                 Versus

     1.   Smt. Kantaben w/o late
          Shri Shantilal Patel,





          aged about 59 years,

     2.   Shri Dilip son of
          late Shri Shantilal Patel,
          aged about 30 years,





     3.   Shri Nilesh s/o late
          Shri Shantilal Patel,
          aged about 27 years,

          all residents of Fule
          Ward, Gadchiroli,
          Tah. & Distt.
          Gadchiroli.                      ....          Respondents.




                                          ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:24:40 :::
                                        3

                                     *****




                                                                              
     Mr. Manoj Pillai, Adv., for the petitioners [absent].




                                                      
     Mr. V.N. Morande, Adv., for respondent nos. 1 to 3
     [absent].

                                     *****




                                                     
                                     CORAM        :     A.H. JOSHI, J.
                                      Date        :      14th December,2009.




                                    
     ORAL JUDGMENT :   
                      
     1.         This    is   a   petition    by       original          land      owner

     tribals.
      


2. The land of tribals transferred to non-tribals was restored by Tahsildar by Order dated 24th October, 1975.

3. The order was not executed for a long time.

4. The non-tribal transferors filed an appeal before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal challenging the order of restoration. It appears that what was challenged was a notice of delivery of possession, and, in fact, the order brought into scrutiny is order dated ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:24:40 ::: 4 24th October, 1975, by which restoration was ordered, which had attained finality by failure to file appeal against the said order.

5. The Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal was kind and courteous enough for condoning the delay in order to do substantive justice, and ultimately allowed the appeal, and has set aside the order of restoration of land to the tribal transferors.

6. The Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal based its order on grounds, namely:-

[a] The land was fallow five years prior to transfer.
[b] The tribal transferors stated on oath that they cannot cultivate land and that the agreement of transfer was made on free will and without any coercion etc. [c] Tribal transferors could not come forward to take possession of the property.

7. Aggrieved by the order setting aside the order ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:24:40 ::: 5 of restoration, present Writ Petition is filed by tribal transferors.

8. The contents of the petition do clarify and reiterate with no ambiguity that the tribal transferors and their family members are not just willing, but are keen to have the land restored.

9. The order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal seems to have been based on compassion to a non-tribal than compassion to a party whose sufferance, and compassion towards whom had fructified into a statutory enactment.

10. It was not open and available for any statutory authority exercise powers and jurisdiction under the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1947, to undo the aims and objects and the very purpose of enacting of the said Act and constituting the authorities thereunder. An authority constituted under the said Act was not competent to defeat the purpose thereof.

::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:24:40 ::: 6

11. The Writ Petition, therefore, deserves to be allowed. Rule is made absolute in terms of Prayer Clauses (i) and (ii) with a direction to Tahsildar to restore the land to the tribals within six months from the date of receipt of Writ of this Court.

JUDGE

-0-0-0-0-

|hedau| ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:24:40 :::