Pamchuru Madhusudan vs The. State Of Ap

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3878 AP
Judgement Date : 1 October, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Pamchuru Madhusudan vs The. State Of Ap on 1 October, 2021
     THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

                   WRIT PETITION NO.12650 OF 2021
ORDER:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-

"....to direct respondent Nos.2 to 4 to delete the names of the unofficial respondent Nos. 5 to 7 in the web-land (1B (ROR) Aangal ect.) with reference to our lands in an Ac. 0-28 cents in Sy. No. 3/6, Ac. 0-22 cents in Sy. No. 3/2A, Ac. 3-43 cents in Sy. No. 3/1, Ac. No. 0-32 cents in Sy. No. 24/1B, Ac.0.79 cents in Sy. No. 28/3C, Ac. 0-21 cents in Sy. No. 3/2B, Ac. 0-88 cents in Sy. No. 3/2C and Ac.0-51 cents in Sy.No. 24/2F total extent of Ac.6-64 cents 3-34 cents out of total extent o AC13-87 cents in various survey numbers situated at Chinnapanduru village fields, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Chittoor District by suspend the 4th respondent order dated 14-03-2021 in D.DIS.ROR/..../2020 and pass such other order..."

2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, Sri V.Eswaraiah Chowdary, learned counsel for the petitioner limited his request to dispose of the representations made by the petitioner dated 21.03.2021 and 26.03.2021, without touching the merits of the case.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, appearing for respondents readily agreed to dispose of the representations made by the petitioner dated 21.03.2021 and 26.03.2021, if any, pending with the respondent-authorities.

4. Recording the submissions of the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition, I need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no 2 such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in "The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1", wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the representations made by the petitioner dated 21.03.2021 and 26.03.2021, I find no other alternative, except to issue such direction.

5. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondent authorities to dispose of the representations made by the petitioner dated 21.03.2021 and 26.03.2021, in accordance with law, within four (04) weeks from today. No costs.

As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Date: 01.10.2021 Psr.

1 2019 (8) SCALE 544 3 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION NO.9698 OF 2021 Date: 01.10.2021 IS