K.Srinivasa Rao vs State Of Ap

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1825 AP
Judgement Date : 15 April, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
K.Srinivasa Rao vs State Of Ap on 15 April, 2021
      THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO

            CRIMINAL PETITION No.984 OF 2019

ORDER:-

     The petitioner is the accused in CC.No.491 of 2018 on the

file of II Additional District Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District

under Section 138 and 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act.


2.   It is the case of the defacto complainant that the petitioner

had issued four post dated cheques for an aggregate amount of

Rs.29,71,000/- towards repayment of the loan obtained by the

petitioner from the defacto complainant. One of these cheques

dated 20.11.2017 given for a sum of Rs.6,57,000/- was

presented in the bank, the same was returned with 'insufficient

funds' vide a return memo dated 27.11.2017. Thereupon a legal

notice dated 30.11.2017 was issued demanding payment of

amount covered under the dishonoured cheque. The notice sent

to the accused was returned on 09.12.2017.        Thereupon the

complaint was filed on 20.12.2017.


3.   The petitioner herein had approached this Court by way of

the present Criminal Petition contending that the fifteen day

period required under Section 138 (c) of Negotiable Instruments

Act had not elapsed before the filing of the complaint as even

according to the complainant, the notice was returned on

09.12.2017

and the complaint was filed on 20.12.2017.

4. Sri T.Venugopal, learned counsel for defacto complainant relies upon a Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 2 Yogendrapratap Singh Vs., Savithri Pandey1 to contend that even in such cases, liberty is available to the defacto complainant to file afresh even his case was to be rejected on the ground that the complaint was premature.

5. A perusal of the complaint clearly shows that the complaint has been filed before the fifteen day period set out under Section 138 (c) of Negotiable Instruments Act had not elapsed. As such the complaint would have treated to be a premature complaint as the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act would be made out only upon refusal or negligence of the payee to pay out the cheque amount within 15 days. It is only on the expiry of the 15th day would the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act made out. In such circumstances CC No.491 of 2018 is quashed leaving it open to the defacto complainant to take such remedies as are available under law.

6. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed.

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

___________________________________ JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO Date : 15-04-2021 sj 1 AIR 2015 SC 157 3 86 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.984 OF 2019 Date : 15-04-2021 sj