Murat Prasad vs Rahul Bhatnagar, Prin. Secy. ...

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 2201 ALL
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2015

Allahabad High Court
Murat Prasad vs Rahul Bhatnagar, Prin. Secy. ... on 8 September, 2015
Bench: Devendra Kumar Arora



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 

?Court No. - 24
 

 
Case :- CONTEMPT No. - 1460 of 2015
 

 
Applicant :- Murat Prasad
 
Opposite Party :- Rahul Bhatnagar, Prin. Secy. Finance Govt. Of U.P. & Ors.
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Prabhat Kumar
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- C S C
 

 
Hon'ble Dr. Devendra Kumar Arora,J.

Heard.

Affidavits of compliance have been filed by the opposite party no.1 and 3.

In the said affidavits it has been averred that in compliance of the order dated 26.8.2014 passed by the writ court, the petitioner has been given notional promotion vide order dated 4.12.2014 and after the financial concurrence and No objection accorded by the State Government, the Assistant Marketing Officer, Gorakhpur has sent the necessary document to the Director, Treasury and Pension for necessary action vide letter dated 22.8.2015. The Pension Directorate, in its turn, has issued the Pension Pay Order dated 4.9.2015 in favour of the petitioner. Therefore, the complete compliance of the order of writ court has been made and the contempt petition is liable to be dismissed. 

Counsel for the petitioner after seeing the affidavit and Pension Payment Order dated 4.9.2015 states that as the order of writ court has been complied with, he does not want to press the matter any further.

Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed and the notices issued to the contemnors are hereby discharged.

Order Date :- 8.9.2015 MH/-