HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 22 Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 182 of 2007 Appellant :- Ram Payri Respondent :- Rajesh And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Dinesh Kumar Rastogi,Mrs.Madhulika Yadav,Nirmal Singh Yadav,Somesh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Jagdish Prasad Maurya Hon'ble Mahendra Dayal,J.
Amended copy of memo of second appeal has been filed today in Court by the appellant, which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for respondents prays for time to file counter affidavit.
He is allowed time to file counter affidavit within two weeks.
List in 3rd week of January, 2016.
Shri J.P. Maurya learned counsel for the appellant submits that his name has wrongly been shown as counsel for the respondents. Similarly name of Mrs. Madhulika Yadav has also been shown as counsel for the appellant.
Office is directed to print the name of Shri J.P. Maurya as counsel for the appellant instead of counsel for the respondents and Mrs. Madhulika Yadav as counsel for the respondents instead of counsel for the appellant.
Order Date :- 10.12.2015 Muk