HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 51 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18424 of 2011 Petitioner :- Nadim Respondent :- State Of U.P. Petitioner Counsel :- Zafeer Ahmad Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of suspicion showing recovery of Rs. 300/-. The applicant was implicated in pick pocketing. The applicant had some altercation with the police and the informant is informer of police, hence, he has been implicated in this case. The applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 31.5.2011, therefore, in the aforesaid facts and circumstances, he is entitled for bail.
Learned AGA opposed the aforesaid prayer that the applicant was apprehended at the spot and recovery of Rs. 300/- was made from him, hence, he is not entitled for bail.
Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and if there is no criminal history against the applicant, I consider that it is a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant Nadim involved in case crime no. 177 of 2011, under section 379, 411 IPC, P.S. Noorpur, District Bijnor be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.
Order Date :- 20.7.2011 Gss