HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 51 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17830 of 2011 Petitioner :- Mutti And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Petitioner Counsel :- V.B.Rao Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the record.
It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the dispute took place with regard to a mobile set. As per the prosecution case, the applicants' mobile set was missing and the applicant assaulted in which Naresh and Mukesh received injuries, however, the injuries are simple in nature. It is further contended that the applicants are in jail since 13.6.2011, therefore, in the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the applicants are entitled for bail.
Learned AGA opposed the aforesaid prayer.
Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I consider it a fit case for bail.
Let the applicants Mutti and Mukhtar involved in case crime no. 62 of 2011, under sections 323, 308, 504 and 506 IPC, P.S. Pailani, District Banda be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.
Order Date :- 11.7.2011 Gss