Gopal Ram Dixit vs State Of U.P. & Others

Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 6374 ALL
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2011

Allahabad High Court
Gopal Ram Dixit vs State Of U.P. & Others on 7 December, 2011
Bench: V.K. Shukla



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 39
 

 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 70470 of 2011
 

 
Petitioner :- Gopal Ram Dixit
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
 
Petitioner Counsel :- Deepak Kumar Shrivastava
 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.
 

 
Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.

Learned standing counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondents. He prays for and is granted eight weeks' time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within next one week.

List thereafter.

It has been stated on behalf of the petitioner that in the present case plantation had been carried out and thereafter it appears that with the passage of time some of the plants  have been found missing, and in this background show cause notice had been issued to the petitioner, to  which the petitioner submitted his reply. Grievance of the petitioner is that reply submitted by him has not been considered in its correct perspective, and the order has been passed directing for recovery from the petitioner, as such order is bad for the simple reason that reply submitted by the petitioner has not been considered in its correct perspective.

The arguments advanced by the petitioner require consideration by this Court, as such till the next date of listing, the amount sough to be recovered from him in pursuance of the impugned order shall not be recovered from the petitioner.

Order Date :- 7.12.2011 SRY