Sunil Kumar And Others vs High Court Of Judicature At ...

Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 3706 ALL
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2011

Allahabad High Court
Sunil Kumar And Others vs High Court Of Judicature At ... on 10 August, 2011
Bench: Rajes Kumar



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 39
 

 
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 44764 of 2011
 

 
Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar And Others
 
Respondent :- High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Thru Its R.G.& Another
 
Petitioner Counsel :- Bhola Nath Singh
 
Respondent Counsel :- Amit Sthalekar
 

 
Hon'ble Rajes Kumar,J.

The petitioners are challenging the selection dated 25.7.2011 made by the respondent no. 1 to the post of Assistant Review Officer pursuant to Advertisement No.1/ARO/2009 dated 29.7.2009 mainly on the ground that (i) The reservation is more than 50% as against the total vacancies of 465, the reservation is of 233 seats. (ii) Rule 9 of the Allahabad High Court Officers and Staff (Conditions of Service and Conduct) Rules, 1976 provides that the candidate must possess a Bachelor's Degree of a University established by law in India or a qualification recognized as equivalent thereto. Now by the advertisement the computer knowledge has been added apart from the Bachelor's Degree. (iii) Rule 12 of the aforesaid Rules provides that the merit list shall be prepared on the basis of the marks obtained in the written examination but the computer marks has also been considered while preparing the merit list. Apart from the aforesaid grounds, the other grounds have also been taken.

The matter requires consideration.

Sri Amit Sthlekar, learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted three weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within one week thereafter.

List in the week commencing 19.9.2011.

Till the next date of listing, the selection and appointment shall be subject to the result of the writ petition.

Order Date :- 10.8.2011 OP