HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 51 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20621 of 2011 Petitioner :- Babu Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Petitioner Counsel :- Rohit Singh,Ram Singh Yadav Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that even if the prosecution case is admitted, the applicant is driver and he had no concerned with VAT (Value Added Tax) mentioned in the invoice. According to the U.P. Value Added Tax, there should be 11 digits in the bill, however, there was only 10 digits in the bills. The applicant has nothing to do with the invoices or the bills. The applicant is in jail since 17.6.2011, therefore, in the aforesaid facts and circumstances, he is entitled for bail. If the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the trial.
Learned AGA opposed the aforesaid prayer.
Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I consider it a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant Babu Lal involved in case crime no. 478 of 2011, under section 467, 468, 420, 471 IPC, P.S. Civil Lines, District Moradabad be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.
Order Date :- 9.8.2011 Gss