Allahabad High Court
Prabhakar Chaurasiya vs Ratnesh Chaurasiya on 19 April, 2011
Bench: Rajes Kumar
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 4 Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 70 of 2010 Petitioner :- Prabhakar Chaurasiya Respondent :- Ratnesh Chaurasiya Petitioner Counsel :- Manu Khare Respondent Counsel :- S.D. Dube,Neeraj Dube Hon'ble Rajes Kumar,J.
Sri S.D. Dube, learned counsel for the respondent states that in paragraph-32 of the counter affidavit, it has been categorically stated that the revisionist is not depositing the rent month to month basis and, therefore, the interim order is liable to be vacated.
Learned counsel for the revisionist states that the fact stated is not correct. The revisionist is regularly depositing the amount. To substantiate this fact that the amount has been deposited in pursuance of the order of this Court dated 4.2.2010. List in the next cause list.
Till then the interim order shall continue.
Order Date :- 19.4.2011 OP