Home / Tag Archives: CBI

Tag Archives: CBI

Court orders CBI probe against Bihar CM Nitish Kumar in Muzaffarpur Shelter Home Case

9 hours ago Latest News 0

February 16, 2019: On Saturday, a Court here has directed ...

Black Money Laundering Case: Court reserves order on Gautam Khaitan’s bail petition for Feb 19

13 hours ago Latest News, Law Firm News 0

February 16, 2019: On Friday, a Delhi Court fixed Feb ...

Money Laundering Case: Court sends corporate lobbyist Deepak Talwar to 14-days judicial custody

1 day ago Corporate Law News 0

February 15, 2019: On Thursday, a Delhi Court sent Corporate ...

CJI Gogoi fumes at Ex. CBI Director in Court’s custody: ‘Go back to your seat or else…’

4 days ago Latest News 0

February 12, 2019: He was found them guilty of Contempt ...

Bihar Shelter Home Case: Supreme Court holds CBI’s Nageswara Rao & Legal Adviser guilty of Contempt of Court, imposes fine ₹1 lakh each

4 days ago Latest News 0

February 12, 2019: On Tuesday, the Supreme Court pulled up ...

IRCTC Scam: Court asks CBI & ED to provide documents to accused Lalu Prasad Yadav & others

4 days ago Latest News 0

February 12, 2019: On Monday, a Delhi court asked the ...

CBI questions Rajeev Kumar and Kunal Ghosh with respect to Saradha and Rose Valley Chit Fund Scams.

5 days ago Latest News 0

February 11, 2019: On Monday, the Central Bureau of Investigation ...

Delhi HC appoints 2G special Judge Mr. O.P. Saini as Judge lncharge of Rouse Avenue Court Complex

7 days ago Latest News 0

O P Saini posted as judge in-charge of new Rouse Avenue Court complex

February 09, 2019: On Friday, Additional Sessions Judge O P ...

VVIP Chopper Case: Christian Michel moves Court seeking bail claiming charge-sheet not filed within time frame

8 days ago Latest News 0

February 09, 2019: On Friday, Christian Michel, arrested in the ...

CBI to question Kolkata Police Commissioner Rajeev Kumar in Chit Fund Scam case today.

8 days ago Latest News 0

February 09, 2019: Today, Kolkata police commissioner Rajeev Kumar is ...

“You have played with Supreme Court’s order, God help you”, SC summons CBI’s Nageswara Rao for shifting probe Officers in Bihar Shelter Home Case

9 days ago Latest News 0

February 07, 2019: On Thursday, the Supreme Court summoned Senior ...

INX Media Case: Former Director Indrani Mukerjea seeks to turn approver in alleged corruption case

10 days ago Latest News 0

February 07, 2019: Almost a year after Indrani Mukerjea gave ...

“Enough is enough, its time for free & fair trial”, says SC; shifts Muzaffarpur Shelter Home Case to Delhi

10 days ago Latest News 0

February 07, 2019: On Thursday, Supreme Court came down heavily ...

INX Media case: HC allows P Chidambaram to file additional documents for anticipatory bail

10 days ago Latest News 0

February 06, 2019: On Wednesday, the Delhi High Court allowed ...

Centre & Attorney General K K Venugopal came down heavy on Activist Lawyer Prashant Bhushan by filing petition for contempt of Top Court; SC issues notice against him

10 days ago Latest News 0

Supreme Court may curb advocates from speaking on cases

February 06, 2019: On Monday, Attorney General K K Venugopal ...

Saradha Chit Fund Scam Case: CBI steaming things up; forms 5-member team to take action on Kolkata Commissioner

11 days ago Latest News 0

CBI forms five member team to grill Kolkata top cop in chit fund cases

February 06, 2019: On Wednesday, the Central Bureau of Investigation ...

HC seeks ED’s response on Lobbyist Deepak Talwar’s petition challenging his deportation

11 days ago Latest News 0

February 05, 2019: On Tuesday, the Delhi High Court sought ...

SC orders: “CBI can question Kolkata Police Chief but can’t Arrest him”; Mamta calls it Victory

12 days ago Latest News 0

February 05, 2019: On Tuesday, the Supreme Court ordered Kolkata ...

CBI saga continues: AG Venugopal files Contempt Petition against Advocate Prashant Bhushan

12 days ago Latest News 0

February 5,2019: On Monday, Attorney General K K Venugopal moved ...

Move after Move: HC refuses Bengal Govt’s petition for urgent hearing against CBI

12 days ago Latest News 0

February 04, 2019: On Monday, the Calcutta High Court refused ...

CBI-Kolkata Police Commissioner Face-off: Apex Court, “We will come down so heavily on him that he will regret”

12 days ago Latest News 0

February 4,2019: On Monday, Supreme Court gave a strict warning ...

Saradha Chit Fund Scam Case: SC to take urgent hearing on CBI’s petition against Kolkata Police Commissioner

12 days ago Corporate Law News, Latest News 0

February 04, 2019: On Monday, the Supreme Court agreed to ...

Indira Jaising: India has no ‘Federal Crimes’, only a Federal Investigating Agency.

13 days ago Latest News 0

February 04, 2019: On Monday, Senior Advocate Ms. Indira Jaising ...

CBI Row: IPS Officer Rishi Kumar Shukla appointed as new CBI Director for a fixed tenure of 2 yrs

14 days ago Latest News 0

February 02, 2019: On Saturday, former MP Police Chief Rishi ...

Page 1 of 1112 3 4 5 » 10...Last »

Saturday, 16, Feb, 2019

KRIPAL SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Indian Penal Code, Section 302 IPC. SC holds, prosecution has proved the case against the present accused/appellant beyond reasonable doubt that the injury on the head of the deceased which was attributed to the accused appellant could in itself be sufficient to cause death and this is what has been considered by the learned trial Court and confirmed by the High Court in appeal. The possibility of over-implication of co-accused Ram Lal, Arjun Singh and Sultan Singh would not in any manner rule out the case of the present appellant and the prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt holding him guilty. No hard and fast rule can be laid down as to how much evidence should be appreciated but what is required is that judicial approach has to be cautious in dealing with such evidence; but the plea that such evidence should be rejected because it is partisan cannot be accepted as correct. Appeal is dismissed.

A.M. Khanwilkar, Ajay Rastogi, JJ

15/2/2019 View judgement PDF

EZAJHUSSAIN SABDARHUSSAIN & ANR. Vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Indian Penal Code, Section 302. SC observed, there cannot be a universal rule in laying down the principles of existence of common intention of prior meeting or meetings with pre-arranged plan. It has to be proved either from the conduct or circumstances of any incriminating facts which is missing in the instant case. The High Court has committed a manifest error in holding the appellants guilty under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for participating in the commission of crime. The appellants deserve to be acquitted of the charges filed against them by giving them benefit of doubt. Appeal is allowed.

A.M. Khanwilkar, Ajay Rastogi, JJ

15/2/2019 View judgement PDF

ANJALI BHARDWAJ AND OTHERS Vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Right to Information Act, 2005. The petitioners through this PIL desires transparency and full disclosure of information depicting : (a) definite criteria for such appointments, (b) and such criteria should be made public in advance. SC observes, the petitioners are right in their submissions that there have been undue delays in filling up of these vacancies. We expect that the vacancies shall be filled up, in future, well in time. Supreme Court lays down directions keeping in view the salient purpose for which RTI Act. The Court observes, RTI Act is enacted not only to sub-serve and ensure freedom of speech. On proper implementation, it has the potential to bring about good governance which is an integral part of any vibrant democracy. Attaining good governance is also one of the visions of the Constitution. Appeal is disposed off.

AK Sikri, S Abdul Nazeer, JJ

15/2/2019 View judgement PDF

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Vs PWD AND FOREST EMPLOYEES UNION & ORS.

Gujarat Civil Services (Revision of Pay) Rules, 2009. SC observes, the respondent workers who have been working on daily wage basis cannot be given casual leave which is more than the entitlement extended to regular Government employees. We accept the plea of the appellant that Government Resolution dated October 17, 1988 which provides for 14 days casual leave including 2 days of voluntary/ optional leave is the result of inadvertent transaction error. The casual leave for daily wagers cannot be more than the regular Government employees. We, therefore, hold that the respondents employees shall be entitled to 12 days of casual leave and 2 days of voluntary leave/restricted leave. Appeal is allowed.

A.K. Sikri, S. Abdul Nazeer, M.R. Shah, JJ

15/2/2019 View judgement PDF

MEHBOOB-UR-REHMAN Vs AHSANUL GHANI

Civil Procedure Code, Section 100. SC observes, the plaintiff-appellant has failed to aver and prove his readiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract. The Trial Court made a rather assumptive observation that he had proved such readiness and willingness. Thereafter, the plaintiff sought leave to amend the plaint only when the ground to that effect was taken in the first appeal by the defendant. SC states, the late attempt to improve upon the pleadings of the plaint at the appellate stage was only an exercise in futility in the present case. The High Court has rightly pointed out that no substantial question of law as regards the correctness of the order refusing the application for amendment was formulated. Appeal is dismissed.

Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari, JJ

15/2/2019 View judgement PDF

PROF R K VIJAYASARATHY & ANR Vs SUDHA SEETHARAM & ANR

Indian Penal Code, Sections 405, 406, 415 and 420 read with Section 34. In the present case, the son of the appellants has instituted a civil suit for the recovery of money against the first respondent. The suit is pending. The first respondent has filed the complaint against the appellants six years after the date of the alleged transaction and nearly three years from the filing of the suit. SC holds, the averments in the complaint, read on its face, do not disclose the ingredients necessary to constitute offences under the Penal Code. An attempt has been made by the first respondent to cloak a civil dispute with a criminal nature despite the absence of the ingredients necessary to constitute a criminal offence. The complaint filed by the first respondent against the appellants constitutes an abuse of process of court and is liable to be quashed. The judgment of the High Court is set aside and the criminal proceedings instituted by the first respondent against the appellants are quashed. No opinion has been expressed on the merits of the pending civil suit filed by the son of the appellants for the recovery of money. Appeal is allowed.

Dr D.Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta, JJ

15/2/2019 View judgement PDF

ESSAR SHIPPING LTD. Vs THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF CALCUTTA

The issue is the alleged negligence of a licensed pilot. SC has found that it was combination of all factors as concluded by the Committee and the matter could not be put at the level of negligence on part of any individual simplicitor. SC observes, it cannot be concluded that the acts of commission or omission on part of the Master of the vessel alone, were responsible for and resulted in causing the damage to the coal loader. He may be held responsible to a certain extent for his non-intimation, but the failure on part of the Berthing Master in doing what was expected of him and other factors were also responsible. The conclusion arrived at by the Committee in the circumstances, which weighed with the Single Judge, is the correct perspective from which the matter is required to be considered. Therefore, the view taken by the trial court was, just and correct and that of the Division Bench was erroneous. Appeal is allowed.

Abhay Manohar Sapre, Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ

15/2/2019 View judgement PDF

PERRY KANSAGRA Vs SMRITI MADAN KANSAGRA

Family Courts Act, Family Court Rules, Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Rules, 2004, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. SC observes, in custody and guardianship disputes between two parties, a minor child is in a peculiar situation. At times, both sides are busy fighting legal battles and the court is called upon in parens patriae to decide what is in the best interest of the child. SC holds, if the reports of the Counsellor touching upon the home environment of the parties concerned, their personalities and their relationship with their child or children would assist the court in determining the custody or guardianship issues, any technicality ought not to stand in the way. Sub-Rule (viii) of Rule 8 seeks to achieve that purpose and makes such material available for the assessment of the court. Statements made by the parents during the course of mediation may not be relied upon on the ground of confidentiality but natural responses and statements made by the minor to the Counsellor would certainly afford a chance to decide what is in the best interest of the child. Appeal is allowed.

Abhay Manohar Sapre, Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ

15/2/2019 View judgement PDF

GIRIRAJ GARG Vs COAL INDIA LTD. & ORS.

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 11. In this case, the Court expanded the application of the \'Doctrine of Incorporation\' by holding that even a general reference to a standard form contract of one party, along with those of trade associations, and professional bodies would be sufficient to incorporate the arbitration clause. SC observes, the High Court in the impugned order has erroneously taken the view that an arbitration clause would not stand incorporated in the individual sale order entered into by the Respondent and the Appellant. The individual sale orders emanate out of the 2007 Scheme. The sale orders specifically state that they would be governed by the guidelines, circulars, office orders, notices, instructions, relevant law etc. issued from time to time by Coal India Limited or Bharat Coking Coal Limited etc. As a consequence, the arbitration clause in the 2007 Scheme would stand incorporated in the sale orders issued thereunder. Appeal is allowed.

Uday Umesh Lalit, Indu Malhotra, JJ

15/2/2019 View judgement PDF

SRINIVASAN IYENGER AND ANR. Vs BIMLA DEVI AGARWAL & ORS.

Constitution of India, Article 142. SC observes, the parties have settled the dispute amicably and that the dispute between the parties seems to be having predominant element of a civil dispute and the origin is predominantly or overwhelming a civil dispute, it is a fit case to exercise the power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to meet the ends of justice. SC allows the parties to compound the offences, even though the offences alleged are non-compoundable, and that the dispute is a private one and between the two private parties. Accordingly, it is ordered that on payment of a sum of Rs.10,00,000 by the Appellants to the original Complainant to be deposited in the bank account of the original Complainant within a period of two weeks, the criminal proceedings stands quashed. Appeal disposed off.

L. Nageswara Rao, M. R Shah, JJ

15/2/2019 View judgement PDF

Latest CaseLaw

Tag Archives: CBI

Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter