Home / Latest News / SC: Wife filing reckless, defamatory & false cases against her Husband is guilty of Cruelty, Divorce granted

SC: Wife filing reckless, defamatory & false cases against her Husband is guilty of Cruelty, Divorce granted


Patently false allegations have the effect of lowering husband’s reputation in the eyes of his peers.

Matrimonial Disputes
Matrimonial Disputes

Holding wife guilty of cruelty on her husband by filing false cases against him, Supreme Court  granted husband divorce and directed him to give her a flat worth Rs 1 crore and Rs 50 lakh as one- time permanent alimony.

Apex court  expounded that cruelty can never be defined “with exactitude” and what it is, will depend upon facts and circumstances of the each case.

Supreme Court further enunciated that,”It is apparent that wife made reckless, defamatory and false accusations against her husband, his family members and his colleagues, which would definitely have effect of lowering his reputation in the eyes of his peers”.

Apex Court further added that,”Mere filing of the complaints is not cruelty, if there are justifiable reasons to file complaints. Merely because no action is taken on complaint or after the trial accused is acquitted may not be a ground to treat such accusations of wife as cruelty within meaning of Hindu Marriage Act.

Apex Court Bench comprising of Justices Adarsh Kumar Goel and Deepak Gupta expounded that,”However, if it is found that allegations are patently false, then there can be no manner of doubt that said conduct of the spouse levelling false accusations against other spouse would be an act of cruelty”.

The couple had got married in the year 1989 according to Hindu rites and a son was born out of wedlock in 1990. They stayed together till 1999 but on March 19, 2000, husband left the matrimonial home and filed a plea for divorce.

After conducting investigation, Police found that not only complaint was false but also the injuries were self-inflicted by wife. The wife was booked for giving false information and the prosecution was launched.

The Bench stated that, “The petition for divorce filed by husband under Section 13 of the Act is decreed and the marriage of the parties solemnized on April 13, 1989 is dissolved by a decree of divorce. Wife shall be entitled to permanent alimony of Rs 50 lakh and a residential flat of the value of up to Rs 1 crore,”.

Apex Court  expounded that though it has held that acts of wife in filing false complaints against husband amounts to cruelty, it is oblivious to requirements of wife to have a decent house where she can live.


Related News @ LatestLaws.in-

2.5.2017 – Technology helps Pune Family Court grant Divorce: Wife allowed to participate via Skype

3.4.2017 – Not wearing ‘Mangalsutra’ or not covering head with ‘Pallu’, are no ground for seeking Divorce, rules High Court, Read Text

17.3.2017 – SC directs District Courts to start using Video Conferencing facility in Divorce, Child Custody Cases to expedite disposal

19.2.2017 – High Court: Innocent children are being used as tools of vengeance by parents in Divorce and Custody matters, Read Order

1.2.2017 – High Court to consider if withdrawl from Mutual Consent Divorce Petition can attract Contempt action

12.12.2016 – High Court: Backing out of the Mutual Consent Divorce petition equals to Mental Cruelty, Read Order

13.11.2016 – Govt. to introduce Bill to amend 150-yr-old Christian Divorce Law in Winter Session

7.10.2016 – SC: Hindu Son can Divorce his Wife if she tries to separate him from his Aged Parents, Read Order

24.8.2016 – Suicide attempt by Wife to falsely implicate Husband’s Family is ‘Cruelty’, Husband deserve Divorce, Read Text

21.8.2016- SC Constitution Bench upholds bar on “Menace” Mechanical Arrests in Dowry Cases

5.6.2016- SC warns Trial Courts: Do not take hyper-technical approach in Matrimonial Cases, Read Judgment

12.5.2016- Domestic Violence Act being misused: Center Govt. cites NCRB Data

12.3.2016- Matrimonial Breakups: After Celebrities Karishma Kapoor, Farhan Akhtar and Hritik Roshan now Malaika Arora files for Divorce Decree

2.3.2016- Supreme Court directs Karisma & Sunjay Kapoor’s Lawyers to settle the Divorce battle

15.12.2015- High Court miffed at unabated misuse of Sec. 498A IPC despited repeated Supreme Court directions, Read Judgment

21.11.2015- Supreme Court expounds despite Judicial Separation wife can still claim Stridhan

16.8.2015- Wife partying all night not a Matrimonial Cruelty, High Court

14.7.2015- After SC rap – Why no uniformity in Divorce Laws, Govt. wakens to amend Law

Facebook Comments

Check Also

Supreme Court

Retired Judges can be appointed to High Courts under Article 217 of the Constitution, SC rules

February 24, 2018 The Supreme Court yesterday ruled that retired judicial officers can be appointed as judges of the High Court under Article 217(2)(a) of the Constitution. The Apex Court also ruled that additional judges can be appointed for a ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *