Home / Latest News / SC pours cold water on aspirations of Tata, Adani Power to get Tariff Relief on hike of Imported Coal Rate

SC pours cold water on aspirations of Tata, Adani Power to get Tariff Relief on hike of Imported Coal Rate


Power Tarif Tuscle
Power Tarif Tuscle                                                 Pic by indiatimes.com

Bench ruled that consumers should not bear the cost of any change in international regulations.

In a blow to the Tata Power and Adani Power,  Supreme Court on Tuesday disallowed any relief to them in five-year-old contentious issue of compensation to their respective power plants.

Order sets a precedent for the power sector that tconsumers should not bear cost of any change in international regulations. At the same time, future of the power plants using the imported coal becomes bleaker.

Matter is realted to the Tata Power’s 4,000-Mw Ultra Mega Power Plant and Adani Power’s 1,980-Mw plant at Mundra, based on the imported coal, which is sourced from Indonesia.

Case was being fought between two companies and State utilities of Gujarat, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Punjab and Haryana. The issue pertains to the pass-through of cost escalation because of the changes in the imported coal prices and the regulations in Indonesian Coal Market.

In accordance with directions of Appellate Tribunal of Electricity (Aptel) and SC, the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) computed relief for two companies, in a December 2016 order.

But SC set aside judgment of both Aptel and CERC, quashing any relief. It has directed CERC to “go into the matter afresh and determine what relief should be granted to those power generators who fall within Clause 13 of the PPA as has been held by us in this judgment”.

Clause 13 of power-purchase agreement pertains to change in the regulations under Indian conditions. Tata and Adani were contesting for a change in rates under the international regulations; thereby judgment leaves very little room for relief for the two, staed Power Sector Experts.

Apex Court has recognised change in the regulations under the Indian conditions, fuel charge included.


Experts also added that, “Projects might become unviable for both the companies.

“Project was unviable from Day 1, given the risk of the dependence on coal from Indonesia and foreign exchange fluctuation. But these aspects were discounted by investors hoping a positive order,” stated Analyst.

TIMELINE: 5 years and back to nothing
2008: Adani Power’s 1,980 Mw project in Mundra commissioned
2012: Tata Power 4,000 Mw UMPP commissioned. It won bid in 2007
2010: The Indonesian energy regulations change coal benchmark price in 2010, leading to escalation of fuel cost
2012: Adani and Tataapproach CERC asking for relief from increased coal prices and other allied costs
Feb 2014: CERC comes out with compensatory tariff of 52 paisa/unit for Tata and 41 paisa/unit for Adani. APTEL also upholds decision allowing the companies to charge higher tariffs
Aug 2014: State govts procuring power approach Supreme Court contesting it. SC asks APTEL to expedite the matter
May 2016: APTEL asks CERC to compute compensation for Tata & Adani as per provisions of their respective PPAs
Dec 2016: CERC allowed Tata & Adani to charge the additional cost of coal from the states, disallowed other costs
11 Apr 2017:  SC denies Tata & Adani to charge any compensatory tariff
Facebook Comments

Check Also

Supreme Court Building

SC on Transfer of Kathua Rape Case: If we find slightest possibility of a lack of a fair trial, we will transfer the case out of Kathua

April 26,2018: In relation to alleged obstruction by the lawyers in administration of justice in the case, SC Bench added that,“If the lawyers are at fault, they would be dealt in accordance with the law.” On Thurcsday, Supreme Court while ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest laws

Join our mailing list to receive the latest laws news and updates from our team.