Home / Latest News / SC: Acqusition of Land at Singur and Allotment to Tatas was wrong, orders return to Farmers, Read Order

SC: Acqusition of Land at Singur and Allotment to Tatas was wrong, orders return to Farmers, Read Order


Court asked Government restore the ownership of the lands to cultivators.

Land Acqusition issue
Land Acqusition issue

After 8 long years, on Wednesday the Apex Court set aside Singur land acquisition by the West Bengal govt. & said that the allotment was wrong.

The bench of Justices V Gopala Gowda & Arun Mishra pronounced the judgment on a batch of petitions which were filed in 2008.

The Buddhadeb Bhattacharya govt. acquired the land in 2006 to enable Tatas to set up their Nano car manufacturing plant in the state of West Bengal but due to violent protests the Tatas shifted their project out of West Bengal to Sanad district in Gujarat .

Meanwhile, this year in May, Justice Gopala Gowda & Justice Arun Kumar Mishra had said that the land was meant for the ‘public purpose’.

The Left Front government’s policy to acquire the land lead to widespread protests in West Bengal & ultimately led to a victory in elections for Mamta Banerjee’s Trinamool Congress.

The Bench ordered the State govt. to identify the land acquired in ten weeks & return the land to the farmers within the next twelve weeks.

The Apex Court directed the State,”Restore the ownership of  lands to the cultivators”.

Supreme Court also said that the farmers can retain the compensation paid to them by their State as they were “deprived” of their ten years’ income from the land because of the State’s acquisition and the compensation will be paid to those who were not paid.

After the Supreme court’s judgement, the 1000 acre land will now be handed back to the farmers.

SC Judgment on Singur, WB Land Case

Facebook Comments

Check Also

Delhi High Court

HC raps Municipal Corporation: You are trying to avoid Transparency in Grievance Redressal Mechanism

March 24,2018: High Court pointed out that despite its earlier orders, a status report had not been filed. This, it opined, suggested that “the respondents are trying to avoid transparency in the grievance redressal mechanism”. Delhi HC has castigated East ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest laws

Join our mailing list to receive the latest laws news and updates from our team.