Wednesday, 10, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on CrPC Section 107. Security for keeping the peace in other cases

Bare Act Title Category / State
CrPC Section 107. Security for keeping the peace in other cases Criminal Laws
 

List of Judgements

STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs. HEEM SINGH

Judgement Date : october/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 584 SC

Headnote :

NOTICETermination of service - An acquittal in a criminal case alone does not justify overturning the disciplinary punishment imposed by the authority.A. According to the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules 1958, Rule 16 - Regarding disciplinary proceedings - The vali...

Rajender Singh Pathania & Ors. Vs. State of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.

Judgement Date : august/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 590 SC

Ghanshyam Vs. State of M.P. & Others [2006] Insc 630 (29 September 2006)

Judgement Date : september/2006, Citation : 2006 Latest Caselaw 630 SC

Nagarjit Ahir Vs. State of Bihar [2005] INSC 34 (12 January 2005)

Judgement Date : january/2005, Citation : 2005 Latest Caselaw 34 SC

State of Rajasthan Vs. Teja Ram & Ors [2000] INSC 33 (1 February 2000)

Judgement Date : february/2000, Citation : 2000 Latest Caselaw 33 SC

State of Haryana Vs. Bhagirath & Ors [1999] INSC 204 (12 May 1999)

Judgement Date : may/1999, Citation : 1999 Latest Caselaw 204 SC

Jagtar Singh & ANR Vs. State of Punjab [1998] INSC 516 (6 November 1998)

Judgement Date : november/1998, Citation : 1998 Latest Caselaw 516 SC

State of U.P. Vs. Abdul & Ors [1997] INSC 500 (5 May 1997)

Judgement Date : may/1997, Citation : 1997 Latest Caselaw 416 SC

Tarun Bharat Sangh Vs. Union of India [1994] INSC 565 (8 November 1994)

Judgement Date : november/1994, Citation : 1994 Latest Caselaw 559 SC

Sikhar Behera Vs. State of Orissa [1993] INSC 391 (28 September 1993)

Judgement Date : september/1993, Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 385 SC

Headnote :

The Court\'s Judgment was presented by K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J. - There are 14 appellants involved in this case. They, along with 25 others, faced trial for offenses under Sections 302, 302/34, 302/149, 232, 324, and 324/149 of the IPC. The trial court found 16 of them guilty and acquitted the other...

Jamna Vs. State of U.P [1993] INSC 368 (21 September 1993)

Judgement Date : september/1993, Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 363 SC

Headnote :

The Court\'s Judgment was delivered by K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J. This appeal arises under Section 379 of the CrPC in conjunction with Section 2 of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act. There are eight appellants involved in this case. They, along with eight others, f...

State of Karnataka Vs. Bheemappa [1993] INSC 282 (13 May 1993)

Judgement Date : may/1993, Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 278 SC

Headnote :

The Court\'s Judgment was presented by DR ANAND, J. - The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Raichur ordered the commitment of Bhimappa (A-1), Karibasappa (A-2), Gobbi Hanumantha (A-3), Talwar Lingappa (A-4), Basangouda (A-5), Jamappa (A-6), Gulappa (A-7), Lachmappa (A-8), Mallikarjun (A-9), Shekharappa (...

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Moti Ram & ANR [1990] INSC 172 (2 May 1990)

Judgement Date : may/1990, Citation : 1990 Latest Caselaw 172 SC

Headnote :

The State has filed this appeal against an acquittal order issued by the High Court concerning the accused respondent. The prosecution claims that there were two opposing factions in the village of Deotaha (U.P.), one led by the accused respondents and the other by the deceased victims. A deep-seate...

State of U.P. Vs. Pussu @ Ram Kishore [1983] INSC 75 (2 June 1983)

Judgement Date : june/1983, Citation : 1983 Latest Caselaw 75 SC

Headnote :

The prosecution\'s case against the accused-respondent was that while the deceased and his wife were returning home from their field, he and a co-accused, armed with a gun and a homemade pistol, shot at the deceased, inflicting injuries. Some passersby, including two eyewitnesses, managed to subdue...

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. K. Venkata Reddy & Ors [1976] INSC 84 (26 March 1976)

Judgement Date : march/1976, Citation : 1976 Latest Caselaw 84 SC

Headnote :

When the bus carrying the deceased and witnesses 1 to 3, along with other passengers, stopped at a bus station, a group of individuals surrounded the bus, forced all the passengers out except for the deceased, and proceeded to stab the deceased multiple times, resulting in his death.Thirteen individ...

Balaka Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab [1975] INSC 97 (16 April 1975)

Judgement Date : april/1975, Citation : 1975 Latest Caselaw 97 SC

Headnote :

A cousin of the deceased, who served as his bodyguard, had a hostile relationship with the first appellant and his group.Years prior to the incident, the first appellant faced murder charges, with the cousin being the main witness for the prosecution. The High Court ultimately acquitted the appellan...

Balak Ram Vs. The State of U.P [1974] INSC 145 (16 August 1974)

Judgement Date : august/1974, Citation : 1974 Latest Caselaw 143 SC

Headnote :

Two individuals, Tribeni Sahai and Radhey, were fatally shot in the town of Dataganj, District Budaun. The four appellants, along with two others, were tried by the Sessions Judge in Budaun for various offenses related to the incident. Balak Ram was found guilty under Section 302 of the Indian Penal...

State of Rajasthan Vs. Tarachand Jain [1973] INSC 104 (1 May 1973)

Judgement Date : may/1973, Citation : 1973 Latest Caselaw 104 SC

Headnote :

The individual, who was a member of the Rajasthan Administrative Service, faced trial before a Special Judge for offenses under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, after obtaining the necessary sanction for prosecution. The respondent cont...

Ram Narain Singh & Ors Vs. State of Bihar [1972] INSC 156 (28 July 1972)

Judgement Date : july/1972, Citation : 1972 Latest Caselaw 156 SC

Headnote :

Section 107 of the Criminal Procedure Code is intended to empower the Magistrate to take actions aimed at preventing offenses that could lead to a breach of peace or disrupt public tranquility. It is incorrect to assert that once the time frame for executing the bond has lapsed, the order becomes in...

Virendra Kumar Saklecha Vs. Jagjiwan & Ors [1972] INSC 91 (22 March 1972)

Judgement Date : march/1972, Citation : 1972 Latest Caselaw 91 SC

Headnote :

The appellant and three respondents were candidates in the 1967 general election for the Madhya Pradesh Assembly. The appellant won the election, but Respondent No. 1 contested his victory through an election petition, accusing him of engaging in corrupt practices. The petitioner claimed that the ap...

Madhu Limaye & ANR Vs. Ved Murti & Ors [1970] INSC 232 (28 October 1970)

Judgement Date : october/1970, Citation : 1970 Latest Caselaw 232 SC

Headnote :

The police apprehended the petitioners due to concerns about violent and destructive behavior, arresting them without a warrant and presenting them to the Magistrate to be bound over under section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. No proceedings were initiated under section 107 prior to their a...

Raj Narain Vs. Supdt. Central Jail, New Delhi [1970] INSC 190 (11 September 1970)

Judgement Date : september/1970, Citation : 1970 Latest Caselaw 190 SC

Headnote :

R was apprehended on August 20, 1970, under sections 107/117 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and was placed in judicial custody by the City Magistrate of Lucknow. A habeas corpus petition was submitted to this Court, which on August 22, 1970, directed that R be transferred to Tihar Central Jail in...

In The Matter of Madhu Limaye & Ors Vs. [1968] INSC 320 (18 December 1968)

Judgement Date : december/1968, Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 320 SC

Headnote :

The petitioners were arrested on November 6, 1968 at a railway station in Bihar. According to the Sub-Inspector's report recorded in the general diary they had taken out a procession in defiance of a prohibitory order under s. 144 Cr. P.C. and had been arrested under s. 151 Cr. P.C. It was state...

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Kokkiliagada Meerayya & ANR [1968] INSC 300 (28 November 1968)

Judgement Date : november/1968, Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 300 SC

Headnote :

Proceedings were initiated under section 107 of the Criminal Procedure Code against four individuals, including the two respondents, leading to an order under section 112 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This order indicated that they were involved in various violent acts that disrupted public peace...

Sk. Piru Bux & Ors Vs. Kalandi Pati Rao & Ors [1968] INSC 260 (29 October 1968)

Judgement Date : october/1968, Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 260 SC

Headnote :

The Hindu respondents initiated a lawsuit against the Muslim appellants, seeking a declaration that the Hindu residents of their villages had the right to conduct both religious and non-religious processions, accompanied by appropriate music, along the roads and public highways in the villages, incl...

Lakhi Prasad Agarwal Vs. Nathmal Dokania [1968] INSC 204 (6 September 1968)

Judgement Date : september/1968, Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 204 SC

Headnote :

The election of the respondent to the Bihar Legislative Assembly during the 1967 general election was contested by the appellant, a defeated candidate, through an election petition. Attached as Annexure 2 to the petition was a pamphlet that was claimed to have been distributed by the respondent and...

Mohar Rai & Bharath Rai Vs. The State of Bihar [1968] INSC 74 (22 March 1968)

Judgement Date : march/1968, Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 74 SC

Headnote :

The first appellant was found guilty under Section 324 of the IPC for shooting and injuring PW 1, at the instigation of the second appellant, who was convicted under Section 324 in conjunction with Section 109 of the IPC. It was convincingly established that there was animosity between the appellant...

Mahendra Pratap Singh Vs. Sarju Singh & ANR [1967] INSC 262 (20 November 1967)

Judgement Date : november/1967, Citation : 1967 Latest Caselaw 262 SC

Headnote :

In a revision submitted by a private party, the High Court exercised its authority under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to mandate a retrial of the appellant, who had previously been acquitted by the Sessions Judge. In this process, the High Court meticulously examined the evidence, s...

Sunder Singh & Ors Vs. The State of Punjab [1962] INSC 14 (19 January 1962)

Judgement Date : january/1962, Citation : 1962 Latest Caselaw 14 SC

Headnote :

Four individuals, S, G, L, and R, were tried for offenses under Section 302 in conjunction with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Sessions Judge acquitted R, giving him the benefit of the doubt, but convicted the other three, sentencing them to death. No appeal was made against R\'s acquittal...

Sheodhyan Singh & Ors Vs. Musammat Santchara Kuer & Ors [1961] INSC 212 (4 May 1961)

Judgement Date : may/1961, Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 212 SC

Headnote :

In the final sale decree of a mortgage case and in the sale certificate, the property in question was incorrectly listed as No. 160 instead of its actual number, No. 1060. Despite this error, the property was otherwise adequately described, allowing for its clear identification. The appellants argue...

Bhagwan Singh Vs. The State Of Punjab [1952] INSC 25 (30 April 1952)

Judgement Date : april/1952, Citation : 1952 Latest Caselaw 25 SC

Headnote :

The Sessions Court has the authority to examine witnesses who were not examined by the Committing Magistrate, as per Section 540 of the Criminal Procedure Code. If a witness is treated as a prosecution witness and examined by the prosecuting counsel instead of by the court, this would, at most, be a...