Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957

·  Repealed by Act 11 of 1960,

·  Repealed by Act 13 of 1960;

·  Repealed by Act 38 of 1960;

·  Repealed by Act 14 of 1961;

·  Repealed by Act 10 of 1962;

·  Repealed by Act 20 of 1962;

·  Repealed by Act 10 of 1965;

·  Repealed by Act 48 of 1965;

·  Repealed by Act 31 of 1966.

·  Amended by Act 14 of 1969;

·  Amended by Act 03 of 1970;

·  Amended by Act 19 of 1970;

·  Amended by Act 32 of 1971;

·  Amended by Act 16 of 1972;

·  Amended by Act 21 of 1973;

·  Amended by Act 22 of 1974;

·  Amended by Act 25 of 1975:

·  Amended by Act 66 of 1976;

·  Amended by Act 29 of 1977;

·  Amended by Act 21 of 1979;

·  Amended by Act 23 of 1979;

·  Amended by Act 06 of 1980;

·  Amended by Act 44 of 1980;

·  Amended by Act 16 of 1981;

·  Amended by Act 11 of 1983;

·  Amended by Act 21 of 1984;

·  Amended by Act 29 of 1984;

·  Amended by Act 27 of 1985;

·  Amended by Act 32 of 1985;

·  Amended by Act 07 of 1986;

·  Amended by Act 23 of 1986;

·  Amended by Act 11 of 1987;

·  Amended by Act 26 of 1988;

·  Amended by Act 18 of 1989,

·  Amended by Act 12 of 1990;

·  Amended by Act 14 of 1990;

·  Amended by Act 49 of 1991;

·  Amended by Act 32 of 1994;

·  Amended by Act 22 of 1995;

·  Amended by Act 33 of 1996;

·  Amended by Act 26 of 1997;

·  Amended by Act 21 of 1998;

·  Amended by Act 27 of 1999;

·  Amended by Act 10 of 2000;

·  Amended by Act 14 of 2001;

·  Amended by Act 20 of 2002.

II

Act 13 of 1979.- The net proceeds of the Additional Duties of Excise, levied under the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957, on sugar, tobacco, cotton fabrics, woollen fabrics Mill man-made fabrics, in replacement of the States' sales taxes on these commodities, are distributed in accordance with the provisions of that Act.

2. At present the distribution among the States is made on the basis of population, State domestic product, and production of these commodities in the ratio 70:20:10, as has been recommended by the Sixth Finance Commission. The Seventh Finance Commission has determined the shares attributable to Union territories and each of the States on the basis of :

(a) in the case of sugar, average despatches of sugar to the Union territories and to each State during the three years ending 1976-77; and

(b) in the case of textiles and tobacco, population according to 1971 census and the average per capita State domestic product, and has indicated the percentage shares attributable to Union territories and payable to each State in respect of each commodity.

3. This Bill seeks to amend the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957, for giving effect to the above recommendations of the Commission. - Gazette of India, 12-4-1979, Pt. II, Section 2, Ext., p. 399.

III

Act No. 6. of 1980.- Central Excise duty was levelled for the first time on cotton fabrics in 1949, on man-made fabrics (rayon or artificial silk fabrics) in 1954 and on woollen fabrics in 1955. From the very early stages of the textile tariff, with a view to achieving progression in the rate structure and to aligning excise control with the demands of different producing sectors, duties have been levied not only on grey fabrics but also at the stage of processing such as bleaching, dyeing and printing.

2. In its judgment dated 24th January, 1979 in the Real Honest Textiles and others v. Union of India (Special Civil Applications Nos. 1552 etc. of 1978), the Gujarat High Court has held that the term "fabric" as used in the tariff description "cotton fabric" would refer to something that is woven; hence it can relate only to cloth in the grey stage; processing of the grey cloth either by bleaching, dyeing or printing does not amount to manufacturing and both before and after processing it remains a fabric falling within the same item of Central Excise Tariff (item 19 - cotton fabric, of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act). The Court arrived at a similar conclusion with respect to man-made fabrics falling under item No. 22 of the same Schedule. The Court observed that processing was an excisable activity covered by the residual tariff Item No. 68 of the said Schedule.

3. After the pronouncement of the above judgment, a number of writ petitions by other parties agitating similar points have been filed in different High Courts. If these High Courts deliver similar judgments, a considerable amount of revenue running into several crores of rupees may become refundable. An appeal against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court is pending in the Supreme Court.

4. The judgment of the Gujarat High Court completely upsets the arrangement regarding levy of excise duties on textile fabrics which has been followed for several years and it will have the effect of disturbing the balance evolved between different sectors of the textile industry besides putting large amounts of revenue at stake. In so far as past assessments are concerned, refunds of duties whose incidence would, in the normal course of business, have been passed on to consumers, would only mean fortuitous gains to the excise assessees.

5. The same problem which has arisen in the case of cotton fabrics and man-made fabrics as a result of the judgment of the Gujarat High Court may arise in the case of woollen fabrics as well.

6. It is, therefore, proposed to amend the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 (which also provides for duties of excise on the aforementioned fabrics) to overcome the difficulty which has arisen as a result of the judgment of the Gujarat High Court. It is also proposed to validate the levies which have been made in the past in respect of these fabrics. 7. The Bill seeks to achieve the above objects. - Gazette of India, 18-5-1979, Pt. II - Section 2, Ext., p. 593 (No. 36).

IV

Act 29 of 1984.- The net proceeds of the additional duties of excise levied under the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957, on sugar, tobacco, cotton fabrics, woollen fabrics and man-made fabrics in replacement of the States sales tax on these commodities are distributed in accordance with the provisions of that Act.

2. The Seventh Finance Commission had determined the shares attributable to Union territories and each of the States on the basis of :

(a) in the case of sugar, average despatches of sugar to the Union territories and to each State during the three years ending 1976-77:

(b) in the case of textiles and tobacco, population according to the 1971 census and the average per capita State domestic product, and had indicated percentage shares attributable to Union territories and payable to each State in respect of each commodity. The present distribution among the States is governed by those recommendations of the Seventh Finance Commission.

3. The Eighth Finance Commission in its interim report have recommended that in respect of the distribution between the Union and the States of the net proceeds of additional duties of excise in lieu of sales tax, the existing arrangements may continue provisionally during the financial year commencing on the 1st day of April, 1984. The Commission have further recommended that the State of Sikkim should also receive a share from the proceeds of additional duties of excise on textiles in lieu of sales tax as the levy of sales tax thereon has been withdrawn by that State and that the percentage shares of all States, including Sikkim in this levy which have been worked out for the Seventh Finance Commission should be applied for inter se distribution in the financial year 1984-85.

4. This Bi1l seeks to amend the Additional Duties of Excise(Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 for giving effect to the above recommendations of the Commission. - Gazette of India, 30-4-1984; Pt. II, Section 2, Ext. p. 11 (No. 26).

V

Act No. 27 of 1985.- The net proceeds of the additional duties of excise, levied under the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957, on sugar, tobacco, cotton fabrics, silk fabrics, man-made fabrics and Woollen fabrics, in replacement of the States sales tax on these commodities are distributed in accordance with the provisions of that Act.

2. The Eighth Finance Commission in its interim report, dated the 14th November, 1983, had recommended that in respect of the distribution between the Union and the States of the net proceeds of additional duties of excise in lieu of sales tax, the existing arrangements as per the recommendations of the Seventh Finance Commission may continue provisionally during the financial year commencing on the 1st day of April, 1984. The Commission had further recommended that the proceeds of additional duties of excise on textiles in lieu of sales tax as the levy of sales tax thereon has been withdrawn by that State and that the percentage shares of all States, including Sikkim in this levy which have been worked out by the Seventh Finance Commission should be applied for inter se distribution in the financial year 1984-85.

3. The Seventh Finance Commission had determined the shares attributable to Union territories and each of the States on the basis of :

(a) in the case of sugar, average despatches of sugar to the Union territories and to each State during the three years ending 1976-77;

(b) in the case of textiles and tobacco, population according to the 1971 Census and the average per capita State domestic product, and had indicated percentage share attributable to Union territories and payable to each State in respect of each commodity.

4. The Eighth Finance Commission in its final report, dated the 30th April, 1984, had recommended that the shares of the States in the Additional duties of excise for all the three commodities, viz., sugar, tobacco and textiles be distributed by giving equal weightage to State domestic production and population. The average State domestic production of the States for the years 1976-77 to 1978-79 and the population as in 1971 Census have been adopted by the Commission in arriving at the percentage shares of the States.

5. The Government has decided to continue with the recommendations of the Eighth Finance Commission contained in its interim report for the financial year commencing on the Ist day of April, 1984, and to implement the recommendations contained in its final report for the period of four years commencing from the 1st day of April, 1985.

6. This Bill seeks to amend the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957, for giving effect to the above recommendations of the Commission. - Gazette of India, 22-3-1985, Pt. II Section 2, Ext., p. 9 (No. 13).

VI

Act 7 of 1986.- Additional excise duties in lieu of sales tax are presently being levied on sugar, tobacco, silk fabrics, woollen fabrics, cotton fabrics and man-made fabrics, as per the rates specified in the First Schedule to the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957. The tariff entries in this Schedule are adopted from the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.

2. It is proposed to specify the central excise tariff by a separate Central Excise Tariff Act which will replace the existing tariff as conte2f' in f6e First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The new tariff proposed will be more detailed and comprehensive. It is, therefore, necessary to make the requisite consequential changes in the first Schedule to the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957, so as to conform to the entries in the new central excise tariff. As regards the rates of duty, by and large, the existing duty structure has been preserved.

3. The Bill seeks to give effect to the above object. - Gazette of India, 13-12-1985, Pt. II Section 2, Ext., p. 264 (No. 67).

VII

Act No. 12 of 1990.- The net proceeds of the additional duties of excise levied under the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957, on sugar, tobacco, cotton fabrics, man-made fabrics and woollen fabrics in replacement of the States' sales tax on these goods are distributed in accordance with the provisions of that Act.

2. The Ninth Finance Commission in its first report dated the 29th July, 1988 had recommended that the shares of the States in the additional duties of excise for the said goods be distributed by giving equal weightage to State domestic product and population. The average State domestic product of the States for the years 1982-83 to 1984-85 and the population as in 1971 census had been adopted by the said Commission in arriving at the percentage shares of the States. To give effect to the above recommendation of the Commission the principal Act was amended by the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Amendment Act, 1989.

3. The Ninth Finance Commission in its second report dated the 18th December, 1989 for the period 1990-95 has recommended that the shares of the States in the Additional Duties of Excise for the said goods be distributed by giving equal weightage to State domestic product and population. They have used the new series of comparable estimates of State domestic product averaged for three years 1982-83 to 1984-85 and the population as in 1981 census in determining the shares of the States inter se in the net proceeds of additional duties of excise.

4. This Bill seeks to amend the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957, for giving effect to the above recommendations of the Ninth Finance Commission in its second report. - Gazette of India, 11-5-1990, Pt. II - Section 2, Ext., P. 4 (No. 19)