हिंदी समाचार पढ़े
Expand
O.P. Jindal Global University
 
Home / Latest News / Supreme Court’s 7 Judge Constitution Bench to revisit 12-year-old verdict on SC/ST quota in govt jobs

Supreme Court’s 7 Judge Constitution Bench to revisit 12-year-old verdict on SC/ST quota in govt jobs

July 11, 2018:

On Wednesday, Supreme Court refused to pass any interim order against its 12-year-old verdict that had dealt with the application of the ‘creamy layer’ for reservations to SC and ST categories in government job promotions, saying it will be examined by a 7 Judge Bench.

Supreme Court
Supreme Court

Apex Court Bench comprising of CJI Dipak Misra and Justice A M Khanwilkar and Justice Chandrachud stated that it cannot hear the matter only for the purpose of interim relief as a reference has already been made to the constitution bench.

Bench stated that,”You see, a reference has already been made for hearing the matter by a larger bench. A seven-judge constitution bench needs to be constituted to consider M Nagaraj verdict which was heard by a five-judge bench”.

The M Nagaraj verdict of 2006 had held that ‘Creamy Layer’ concept cannot be applied to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes for promotions in government jobs, like two earlier verdicts of 1992 Indra Sawhney and others versus Union of India (popularly called Mandal Commission verdict) and 2005 E V Chinnaiah versus State of Andhra Pradesh which had dealt with creamy layer in Other Backward Classes category.

Attorney General K K Venugopal, appearing on behalf of Centre submitted that matter required urgent consideration by a seven-judge constitution bench as lakhs of jobs in Railways and the services were stuck due to confusion over various judicial pronouncements.

Senior Advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing  on behalf of one of the Petitioners, contended that a lot of confusion has occurred due to conflicting judicial pronouncements given by different benches of apex court and high courts.

He said that one of the orders says there would be “status quo” as far as reservation in promotion to SC/ST employees are concerned, while another order by a bench headed by Justice Kurian Joseph in a similar matter held that pendency of a petition before a court shall not stand in the way of the Centre taking steps for the purpose of promotion.

Nagaraj Verdict had reiterated that Ceiling-limit of 50 per cent, concept of Creamy Layer and the compelling reasons like backwardness, inadequacy of representation and overall administrative efficiency were all constitutional requirements, without which the structure of equality of opportunity in Article 16 would collapse.

Verdict stated that State was not bound to make reservation for SC/ST in matter of promotions.

Facebook Comments

Hindu Hindu

TOI

Lawyers Bearing the Burden Literally Lawyers Bearing the Burden Literally pic by OMG

TOI

[caption id="attachment_97474" align="alignleft" width="621"]Donald Trump’s immigration ban Donald Trump’s immigration ban[/caption] Hindu State of Two Nations State of Two Nations               pic by sandeep [caption id="attachment_97462" align="alignleft" width="524"]Painting India Saffron Painting India Saffron[/caption] Hindu Hindu TOI Time to straighten up Time to straighten up                pic by TOI Soaring of Oil Prices pic by indiaone If India takes One Step, we will take Two by Satish If India takes One Step, we will take Two ...................by Satish Demonitisation Diaries Demonitisation Diaries                                                       by sify

TOI

State of Affairs Women Safety: State of Affairs             pic by mangal

Hindu

150425_-_farmers_a_2384764f

Hindu

Hindu

pinterest

Hindu ALL_1_Theme_01A_24_2383617g

Hindu

Hindu

Hindu

TOI

Job Hazards

Hindu

Tax Reforms    by Hindu Tax Reforms by Hindu Pic by Hindu Women Empowerment and Sports Women Empowerment and Sports Acheche DIn Acheche Din     pic by sify

Hindu Hindu

TOI TOI Demonitisation Diaries 1 Demonitisation Diaries 1                                  pic by sify  

TOI

TOI

Hindu

Hindu

Hindu

TOI

America First Walk Your own Talk [caption id="attachment_97477" align="alignleft" width="621"]UIDAI Leaks UIDAI Leaks[/caption] TOI Belts are for Dogs Belts are for Dogs Let Justice Be Let Justice Be Alligator vs Litigator Alligator vs Litigator Missing the Point Missing the Point pic by english blog

IBN IBN

Hindu Cartoon Hindu TOI Four Pillars of Democracy Four Pillars of Democracy             by Satish

...as an eminent lawyer you ought to know that your action tantamount to, under Section B, sub-section G.VIX, read along with I.P.C. (A) XI (B), notwithstanding...                                        TOI

TOI

TOI

Hindu

Demonitisation Diaries 2 Demonitisation Diaries 2  pic by sify [caption id="attachment_97467" align="alignleft" width="621"]Humour with Latest Laws Humour with Latest Laws[/caption] Hindu TOI Humour @ Latest Laws Achhey Din Humour @ Latest Laws: Achhey Din

Hindu Hindu

Auto Driver thrashed for no fault Auto Driver thrashed for no fault,                  source oneindia Delivery Boy Delivery Boy                    by Satish
 
 
 

Check Also

Vijay Mallya

‘Who leaves with 300 bags & huge cargo?’, ED questions Vijay Mallya’s lawyer

December 13, 2018: On Wednesday, the Enforcement Directorate or ED asked Vijay Mallya’s lawyer, ‘Who goes to attend a meeting with “300 bags”?’ in a special court in Mumbai countering the claim that the liquor baron had left India in ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest laws

Join our mailing list to receive the Latest Laws News and updates from our team.