हिंदी समाचार पढ़े
Expand
O.P. Jindal Global University
 
Home / Case Analysis / SC expounds: HC was not justified in entering into question Whether respondent had requisite intention to aid, instigate or abate commission of suicide. Read Judgment

SC expounds: HC was not justified in entering into question Whether respondent had requisite intention to aid, instigate or abate commission of suicide. Read Judgment

December 3,2018:

Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Justice D Y Chandrachud, at the Supreme Court, have ruled in the judgment of the case- Narayan Malhari Thorat v. Vinayak Deorao Bhagat and Another, delivered on November 28, 2018, that Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court  was not justified in entering into question whether the first respondent had the requisite intention to aid, instigate or abate the commission of suicide.

At this juncture, when the investigation was yet to be completed and charge-sheet, if any, was yet to be filed, the HC ought not to have gone into the aspect whether there was aspect of mens rea (requisite mental element or intention) was seen anytime on the part of the first respondent.

The appeal in this case was directed against the judgment and order delivered by the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court on March 28, 2016,allowing criminal application 380/2015 preferred by the respondent and thereby quashing the proceedings instituted against him as per FIR 35/2015.

The FIR was lodged with the Police Station Washim on February 14, 2015pursuant to the information received from the appellant. It was alleged that the daughter and son-in-law of the appellant were teachers in a village, in a Zilla Parishad school where the first respondent was also a teacher, who used to call on the mobile of the daughter of the appellant to harass her. Despite efforts on the part of the husband to persuade him not to do so, the respondent continued to do so repeatedly.

On February 9, 2015, there was a verbal altercation between the two and on February 12, 2015, the appellant’s son-in-law, Sanjay committed suicide leaving a suicide note in Marathi, the English translation of that reads as under:

“Sir Police Station Officer, I humbly request that my family life has been ruined by Vinayak Bhagat  & therefore he should not be pardoned this is my humble request & he should be hanged till death this is my  last wish”

After the crime was registered, the first respondent had preferred an application for anticipatory bail which was rejected by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Washim on February 21, 2015. The matter was carried further by filing criminal application in the HC. The prayer was rejected by the HC on April 7, 2015.

The view taken by the HC was challenged through a special leave petition but the Supreme Court rejected the challenge on April 29, 2015finding no merit in that SLP.

The first respondent, thereafter, filed criminal application in the HC under section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the FIR registered in response to the complaint filed by the appellant, for the offence punishable under section 306 IPC. By way of interim relief, stay of further proceedings in connection with the Crime was also sought. It is a matter of record that the investigation in the crime has not been concluded. The challenge raised by the first respondent was accepted by the HC.

After referring to the facts that the first respondent used to call on the mobile of the daughter of the appellant and that there were heated exchanges between his son-in-law and the first respondent, the HC observed as under:

“There is no material whatsoever even of a prima facie nature to establish that the applicant had either an intention to aid or instigate or abet Sanjay to commit suicide. There is no reference to any active or direct act on the part of the applicant which led said Sanjay to commit suicide.

“Similarly, there is neither any instigation nor any intentional act done which compelled the son-in-law  of non-applicant no. 2 to commit suicide. Even the chit found in the pocket of the deceased does not contain any such material to indicate any instigation or abetment on the part of the applicant herein that could be treated as having led Sanjay to commit suicide.”

This decision of the HC and the order quashing the FIR were under challenge in this case before the Supreme Court. Submission on behalf of the  appellant was that the HC was not justified in entering into questions whether the record prima facie established that the respondent had requisite intention in order to bring the matter within the confines of section 306 IPC and in quashing the FIR in exercise of jurisdiction under section 482 Cr.P.C.

On the other hand, the first respondent’s counsel relied upon the Supreme Court’s decisions in the cases – Netai  Dutta v. State of W.B. -(2005) 2 SCC 659, M. Mohan v. State represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police –(2011) 3 SCC 626 and;  State of Kerala and Others v. Unnikrishnan Nair and Others – (2015) 9 SCC 639 in support of his submission that in exercise of  jurisdiction under section 482 Cr.P.C. the  HC was justified in quashing the FIR.

Turning to the facts of the case, the Supreme Court has pointed out that there are definite allegations that the first respondent- Vinayak Bhagat would keep on calling the wife of the victim – the son-in-law of the appellant on mobile and keep harassing her, which allegations are supported by the statements of the mother and wife of the victim recorded during the investigations.

The record shows that 3-4 days prior to the suicide by the son-in-law of the appellant, there was a altercation between the victim and the first respondent.

In the light of these facts, coupled with the fact that the suicide note made definite allegation against the first respondent, the HC was not justified in entering into the question of mens rea on the part of the first respondent in instigating the suicide.

Seeing merit in the submissions advanced on behalf of the appellant, the Supreme Court set aside the judgment and order under appeal and allowed this appeal. Since the investigation into the matter was stalled as a result of the petition under section 482 Cr.P.C., The Court has directed the concerned authorities to complete the investigation as early as possible.

The Court has stated that it has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, which shall be considered at the appropriate stage and allowed the appeal.

The Author, Advocate R.S Agrawal has working experience in Journalism and Law spread over several decades in Nagpur, Maharashtra. He is doing legal reporting for several leading newspapers in Nagpur and contributing a weekly Legal Column – ‘Current Trends  In Law’  to a more than century-old newspaper “The Hitavada” since more than 25 years.

Read Judgment @LatestLaws.com:

Supreme Court Judgment on Mens Rea in Abetment to Suicide cases (Download PDF)

Supreme Court Judgment on Mens Rea in Abetment to Suicide Cases by Latest Laws Team on Scribd

Facebook Comments

 
Related tags :
 

TOI

Hindu Belts are for Dogs Belts are for Dogs

Hindu

State of Affairs Women Safety: State of Affairs             pic by mangal Alligator vs Litigator Alligator vs Litigator [caption id="attachment_97477" align="alignleft" width="621"]UIDAI Leaks UIDAI Leaks[/caption] Cartoon Hindu

TOI

Let Justice Be Let Justice Be TOI

TOI

Auto Driver thrashed for no fault Auto Driver thrashed for no fault,                  source oneindia Tax Reforms    by Hindu Tax Reforms by Hindu [caption id="attachment_97462" align="alignleft" width="524"]Painting India Saffron Painting India Saffron[/caption]

Hindu

TOI Hindu

Hindu

TOI

Hindu

Hindu

IBN IBN

Four Pillars of Democracy Four Pillars of Democracy             by Satish [caption id="attachment_97467" align="alignleft" width="621"]Humour with Latest Laws Humour with Latest Laws[/caption] TOI [caption id="attachment_97474" align="alignleft" width="621"]Donald Trump’s immigration ban Donald Trump’s immigration ban[/caption] ALL_1_Theme_01A_24_2383617g

Hindu

Hindu Demonitisation Diaries Demonitisation Diaries                                                       by sify

Hindu

TOI

Demonitisation Diaries 2 Demonitisation Diaries 2  pic by sify Lawyers Bearing the Burden Literally Lawyers Bearing the Burden Literally pic by OMG Hindu State of JudiciaryState of Judiciary by Sandeep Adhwaryu of TOI

...as an eminent lawyer you ought to know that your action tantamount to, under Section B, sub-section G.VIX, read along with I.P.C. (A) XI (B), notwithstanding...                                        TOI

TOI Demonitisation Diaries 1 Demonitisation Diaries 1                                  pic by sify   Missing the Point Missing the Point pic by english blog Hindu

TOI

pinterest

150425_-_farmers_a_2384764f

Hindu

America First Walk Your own Talk Hindu Hindu Soaring of Oil Prices pic by indiaone

TOI

Job Hazards State of Two Nations State of Two Nations               pic by sandeep Acheche DIn Acheche Din     pic by sify Pic by Hindu Women Empowerment and Sports Women Empowerment and Sports Delivery Boy Delivery Boy                    by Satish

TOI

Hindu Hindu TOI If India takes One Step, we will take Two by Satish If India takes One Step, we will take Two ...................by Satish Time to straighten up Time to straighten up                pic by TOI

TOI

Hindu

Hindu

Hindu Hindu

TOI

Hindu Hindu

Humour @ Latest Laws Achhey Din Humour @ Latest Laws: Achhey Din
 
 
 

Check Also

President Ram Nath Kovind

President promulgates Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2019; Read Gazette

February 21, 2019: On Tuesday, the Union Cabinet approved the promulgation of an Ordinance, namely “the Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2019 to bring in necessary official amendments in the Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Bill, 2018. The proposal will ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *