हिंदी समाचार पढ़े
Expand
O.P. Jindal Global University
 
Home / Latest News / High Court: Civil Courts have no Jurisdiction to adjudicate on matters vested with NCLT

High Court: Civil Courts have no Jurisdiction to adjudicate on matters vested with NCLT

October 20, 2018

A recent judgement by the Delhi High Court it has been held that Civil Courts don’t have jurisdiction to adjudicate on matters vested with the NCLT under the Companies Act, 2013.

Under the Companies Act, 1956, HCs were vested with original jurisdiction as a ‘Company Court’ to adjudicate certain matters. The jurisdiction which was divided between the erstwhile Company Law Board (CLB) & High Court was clubbed & transferred to the NCLT under the 2013 Act.

In the present case, the High Court interpreted Section 430 of the 2013 Act strictly, & ruled that High Courts (which’re now ordinary Civil Courts for the purpose of 2013 Act) won’t entertain disputes for which a remedy before the NCLT has been provided.

The dispute pertains to an allegation of non-compliance with Section 62 of the 2013 Act. This provision provides for the procedure to be followed while making a further issue of share capital (or rights issue). The plaintiff, SAS Hospital, owned 99.96 percent shares of the Defendant Company, Surya Construction Pvt Ltd prior to the allotment of shares in dispute.

After the allotment, its shareholding was diluted to 21.44 percent. The Plaintiffs argued that money belonging to the company was moved in a circular manner to show an artificial deposit for allotment of shares. The Plaintiffs had, therefore, prayed for annulment of this allotment.

The case was pending before the CLB also, where an order of status quo was obtained by the Plaintiffs. They had also obtained an order of injunction from the Civil Court.

In the proceeding before the High Court, however, the maintainability was challenged by the Defendants. They argued that Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013 doesn’t permit the Civil Courts “to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of any matter which the Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal is empowered to determine by or under this Act ”.

The consequence of non-compliance with Section 62 can be found in two provisions, both of which grant NCLT the exclusive jurisdiction:

Section 59, under which an application can be made for rectification of register of members, or Section 242, if the affairs of the company are conducted in a prejudicial manner.

The High Court noted the broad & far-reaching consequences of the powers provided to the NCLT under Section 242, which’re greater than a Civil Court’s power. It then referred to various other judgments which upheld NCLT’s authority to adjudicate on all matters, including the ones which were under the jurisdiction of the High Courts under the 1956 Act.

The Court found that as per the 1956 Act, the HC was the Company Court for deciding cases such as the present one. However, the High Court hasn’t been granted original jurisdiction under the 2013 Act, & will be treated as a Civil Court.

It found that Section 59 has specific consequences for non-compliance & that the NCLT order’s only appealable before the NCLAT. Accordingly, the Court held NCLT is the right forum to decide on the above matter. However, a Trial Court can examine the cases where issues of fraud or collusion come up, the Court added.

The plaint was thus rejected & Plaintiffs were asked to approach the NCLT for relief.

Facebook Comments

 
Related tags :
 
[caption id="attachment_97477" align="alignleft" width="621"]UIDAI Leaks UIDAI Leaks[/caption] TOI State of JudiciaryState of Judiciary by Sandeep Adhwaryu of TOI

TOI

Humour @ Latest Laws Achhey Din Humour @ Latest Laws: Achhey Din TOI

TOI

Hindu

Hindu

Missing the Point Missing the Point pic by english blog Alligator vs Litigator Alligator vs Litigator [caption id="attachment_97462" align="alignleft" width="524"]Painting India Saffron Painting India Saffron[/caption] Hindu Lawyers Bearing the Burden Literally Lawyers Bearing the Burden Literally pic by OMG

TOI

Demonitisation Diaries 1 Demonitisation Diaries 1                                  pic by sify   TOI

Hindu Hindu

[caption id="attachment_97474" align="alignleft" width="621"]Donald Trump’s immigration ban Donald Trump’s immigration ban[/caption] Hindu Hindu

Hindu

Demonitisation Diaries 2 Demonitisation Diaries 2  pic by sify TOI [caption id="attachment_97467" align="alignleft" width="621"]Humour with Latest Laws Humour with Latest Laws[/caption]

...as an eminent lawyer you ought to know that your action tantamount to, under Section B, sub-section G.VIX, read along with I.P.C. (A) XI (B), notwithstanding...                                        TOI

TOI

Hindu Job Hazards

Hindu

Let Justice Be Let Justice Be State of Two Nations State of Two Nations               pic by sandeep

TOI

Cartoon TOI Hindu Delivery Boy Delivery Boy                    by Satish State of Affairs Women Safety: State of Affairs             pic by mangal Hindu Hindu Demonitisation Diaries Demonitisation Diaries                                                       by sify Tax Reforms    by Hindu Tax Reforms by Hindu America First Walk Your own Talk If India takes One Step, we will take Two by Satish If India takes One Step, we will take Two ...................by Satish

TOI

Hindu

Four Pillars of Democracy Four Pillars of Democracy             by Satish Belts are for Dogs Belts are for Dogs

IBN IBN

TOI Acheche DIn Acheche Din     pic by sify

pinterest

Hindu

TOI

Auto Driver thrashed for no fault Auto Driver thrashed for no fault,                  source oneindia 150425_-_farmers_a_2384764f

Hindu

Soaring of Oil Prices pic by indiaone Hindu

TOI

TOI

Time to straighten up Time to straighten up                pic by TOI

Hindu Hindu

Pic by Hindu Women Empowerment and Sports Women Empowerment and Sports Hindu

Hindu

Hindu ALL_1_Theme_01A_24_2383617g

Hindu

Hindu

 
 
 

Check Also

President Ram Nath Kovind

President promulgates Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2019; Read Gazette

February 21, 2019: On Tuesday, the Union Cabinet approved the promulgation of an Ordinance, namely “the Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2019 to bring in necessary official amendments in the Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Bill, 2018. The proposal will ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *