Tuesday, 09, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Varthya Sevya Naik vs Smt. Shams Khatoon
2025 Latest Caselaw 340 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 340 Tel
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2025

Telangana High Court

Varthya Sevya Naik vs Smt. Shams Khatoon on 11 July, 2025

Author: P.Sam Koshy
Bench: P.Sam Koshy
              THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

                  CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2239 of 2025

ORDER:

The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioners under

Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 20.06.2025, in

I.A.No.1002 of 2025 in I.ANo.192 of 2024 in I.A.No.397 of 2023 in O.S.No.42

of 2023, passed by the Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge at Chevella, Ranga Reddy

District.

2. Heard Mr. A.P. Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, and

Mr. P.Achutam Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents.

3. Vide the impugned order; the Trial Court has dismissed a petition filed by

the petitioners herein under Order VIII Rule 8A read with Section 151 of Code

of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, the 'CPC') to receive the documents filed

along with the said petition on record and also to decide I.A.No.192 of 2024.

4. The documents sought to be brought on record are as under:

S. Date if any of Parties to the Description of Document No. documents Documents vernacular in English

1. 20.02.2023 Petitioners & Copy of W.P. No.5011 of 2023 Respondents

2. 21.02.2023 Petitioners & Copy of Order in W.P. No.5011 of Respondents 2023

3. 29.09.2023 Petitioners & Certified copy of Memo filed by Respondents Petitioners/Respondents

4. 13.09.2023 Petitioners & Certified copy of Order in W.P.

5. 08.02.2023 Petitioners & Certified copy of Complaint lodged by Respondents the Petitioners herein against Respondents/Plaintiffs herein.

6. 08.02.2023 Petitioners & Certified copy of FIR No. 68 of 2023 Respondents on the file of Shankarpally Police.

7. 29.02.2024 Petitioners Certified copy of Charge Sheet in CC.

No. 177 of 2024 on the file of Metropolitan Magistrate at Chevella.

8. 30.08.2023 Petitioners Certified copy of reply to RTI Application vide its No. RTI/208/2023, issued by Tahasildar, Shankarpally

9. 01.02.2024 Petitioners Certified copy of reply to RTI Application vide RTI/15/2024, issued by Tahasildar, Shankarpally

10. 05.08.2023 Petitioner No.1 Certified copy of possession confirmation certificate of Petitioner No.1 herein issued by Mandal Girdawar, Shankarpally

11. 05.08.2023 Petitioner No.2 Certified copy of possession confirmation certificate of Petitioner No.2 herein issued by Mandal Girdawar, Shankarpally

12. 05.08.2023 Petitioner No.3 Certified copy of possession confirmation certificate of Petitioner No.3 herein issued by Mandal Girdawar, Shankarpally

13. 05.08.2023 Petitioner No.4 Certified copy of possession confirmation certificate of Petitioner No.4 herein issued by Mandal Girdawar, Shankarpally

14. 11.07.2023 Petitioner No.5 Copy of Show Cause Notice No. OM Dis. No. 981 of 2023 in Crime No.23 of

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that these documents are

pertinent and relevant documents to dispute the contention of the respondents

insofar as opposing their prayer for grant of injunction in Order XXXIX Rule 1

& 2 petition which is pending consideration before the Trial Court. He further

submits that these documents are also relevant to show that it is the petitioners

who are in possession and that the respondents are not in possession. He further

submits that the documents also have proof of the suit schedule land being

occupied by the petitioners and they are also cultivating the said land.

6. However, perusal of the records would go to show that the documents at

Sl.Nos.1 to 4 are proceedings decided by this High Court pertaining to the

respondents and the orders and judgments passed in the said writ petitions. The

said documents being public documents, this Court finds no good reason in

bringing those documents on record as the writ petitions and the orders passed

therein are all public documents which the petitioners would be otherwise also

entitled to rely on in the course of their arguments. However, as regards the

other documents reflected in Sl.Nos.5 to 14 seem to have some bearing to the

dispute involved in the suit, and therefore, this Courts does not find any

prejudice that would be caused to the interest of the respondents if those

documents are received and marked subject to proving of the same in

accordance with the provisions of law. The admissibility and relevance should

also be taken note by the Trial Court after receiving the same strictly in

accordance with law.

7. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the respondents submits that the

suit is one which has been filed in the early part of 2023 and it is more than two

years that on some pretext or the other the petitioners have been avoiding the

arguments on the petition for grant of injunction and the matter now stands

fixed on 16.07.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, disputes the

said contention and submits that they were always willing to argue the matter;

however, it was only because of the refusal by the Trial Court in receiving those

documents that they were not in a position to argue the case.

8. Be that as it may. This Court is inclined to allow the petitioners prayer to

receive the documents at Sl.Nos.5 to 14 subject to the necessary proof of these

documents being shown to the Trial Court and the admissibility and relevance

also in respect of the same. It is ordered that the documents listed at Sl.Nos.5 to

14 be received for the purpose of marking, subject to proving the same by the

petitioners. However, it is made clear that after receiving those documents, the

Trial Court shall ensure that the petition for grant of injunction filed under

Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of CPC i.e. I.A.No.397 of 2023 is taken up for

consideration and the same is heard on 16.07.2025 itself and appropriate orders

are passed in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. It is further

made clear that the petitioners under no circumstances should be permitted to

avoid arguing I.A.No.397 of 2023 on the date fixed i.e. on 16.07.2025.

9. The present Civil Revision Petition accordingly stands partly allowed.

10. As sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed.

However, there shall be no order as to costs.

_________________ P.SAM KOSHY, J

Date: 11.07.2025 GSD

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter