Tuesday, 09, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The L.A.O. And R D O, Miryalaguda vs Shaik Gousia Bee, Nalgonda Dist And 19 ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 2830 Tel

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2830 Tel
Judgement Date : 25 July, 2024

Telangana High Court

The L.A.O. And R D O, Miryalaguda vs Shaik Gousia Bee, Nalgonda Dist And 19 ... on 25 July, 2024

Author: Abhinand Kumar Shavili

Bench: Abhinand Kumar Shavili

 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
                      AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

                          LAAS.No.299 of 2015
JUDGMENT:

(per Hon'ble Sri Justice Laxmi Narayana Alishetty)

Heard learned Government Pleader for Appeals appearing

for the appellant and the learned counsel for the

respondents/claimants.

2. This appeal, under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act,

1894, (for short 'the Act') is filed by the Land Acquisition Officer,

Miryalaguda, aggrieved by the common order and decree dated

27.04.2015 passed in respect of O.P.No.47 of 2013 on the file of

the Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda.

3. The undisputed facts of the case are that the subject lands

situated in Sy.Nos.711, 712, 713, 722, 724, 668 and 687,

admeasuring different extents, both dry and I.D., totalling to

Acs.5.12 guntas situated in the limits of Damaracherla Village and

Mandal, Nalgonda District, belonging to the respondents/ claimants

were acquired for laying Railway line from Vishnupuram to 2 AKS,J & LNA, J

Janpahad; that draft Notification under Section 4(1) of the Act was

published in A.P. Gazette on 28.01.2009; that the Land Acquisition

Officer, after conducting award enquiry, passed Award, dated

23.03.2010, granting compensation @ Rs.1,00,000/- per acre for

dry lands and Rs.1,25,000/- per acre for ID lands.

4. Not being satisfied with the said Award, the respondents/

claimants sought reference under Section 18 of the Act and the

same was numbered as O.P.No.47 of 2013 on the file of the Senior

Civil Judge, Miryalaguda.

5. Before the Reference Court, on behalf of the respondents/

claimants, P.Ws-1 to 10 were examined and Exs.A-1 and A-21

were marked. On behalf of the Referring Officer, RW-1 was

examined and Ex.B-1-Award was marked.

6. It is contended by the learned Government Pleader for

Appeals appearing for the appellant that the Reference Court failed

to note that the acquired lands are agricultural lands and as such,

there is no scope for development of the same; that the Reference

Court erred in relying upon the documents pertaining to small 3 AKS,J & LNA, J

extents of lands while grating compensation to large extent of land

as in the present case and thereby, erred in drastically enhancing

the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer and as

such, the impugned order is liable to be set aside.

7. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the

respondents/claimants, contended that the Reference Court, taking

into account the oral and documentary evidence adduced before it,

rightly enhanced the compensation for the acquired lands and the

same needs no interference by this Court.

8. Before the Reference Court, to support their claim,

respondent No.18/claimant No.18 got examined himself as P.W-1

and deposed that Damaracherla is a Mandal Head Quarter since

1985 and has civil amenities like Mandal Development Office,

Banks, several educational institutions, Railway Station, etc., and it

is one of the business centres in Nalgonda District; that lands

similar to acquired lands were sold for commercial and non-

commercial purposes and the transactions range between

Rs.1,000/- to Rs.1,500/- per square yard.

4 AKS,J & LNA, J

9. P.W-5 deposed that he sold land to an extent of 730 square

yards in Sy.No.712 of Damaracherla Village for a consideration of

Rs.700/- per square yard, vide document No.5360/2008, dated

24.11.2008.

10. P.W-7 deposed that he purchased an extent of 194 square

yards of land in Sy.No.713/A of Damaracherla Village for a

consideration of Rs.490/- per square yard, vide document

No.2207/2006, dated 11.08.2006.

11. R.W-1-Land Acquisition Officer while reiterating the

contents of the Award, admitted that the acquired lands are

adjacent to Damaracherla Village; Damaracherla Village is situated

on both sides of State Highway i.e., from Hyderabad to Guntur

(Narkatpalli to Addanki) and Hyderabad to Narketpalli comes

under National Highway and then Narketpally to Addanki is a State

Highway and further leading to Chennai on National Highway;

and that there are several cement factories viz., India Cement

Industry, Deccan Cement Industry, Penna Cement Industry located

in and around Damaracherla Village within a distance of 10 kms

radius.

5 AKS,J & LNA, J

12. From the evidence available on record, it can be gathered

that the acquired lands are situated on either side of State Highway

and also Damaracherla Village is a Mandal Head Quarter with all

civic amenities, Government offices, educational institutions, etc.

Further, the existence of various Cement Industries within a

distance of 10 kms radius from the acquired lands also goes to

show that the acquired lands have high potentiality to be converted

into non-agricultural purposes i.e., for house sites, for establishing

industries, etc.

13. Thus, ample evidence is on record to the effect that the

acquired lands, though agricultural lands, are fit and have high

potentiality to be converted as non-agricultural lands. The evidence

of R.W-1 also fortifies the case of the claimants that the acquired

land are situated on either side of State Highway of Narketpalli to

Addanki road and are adjacent to Damaracherla Village. Therefore,

this Court is of the considered opinion that the Reference Court has

rightly assessed the compensation for the acquired lands on yard

basis.

6 AKS,J & LNA, J

14. Further, it is to be noted that though the claimants have got

marked as many as 21 exhibits, the extents of land covered under

majority of the said exhibits are very small and hence, this Court is

of the opinion that the sale consideration reflected in the said

documents cannot be taken as representative sale price for

assessing the market value of the acquired lands.

15. However, it is pertinent to note that Exs.A-1 to A-5 pertain

to sale transactions of the years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 in

respect of land in Sy.Nos.713 and 713/A of Damaracherla Village.

Of all the said transactions, the land sold under Ex.A-2-sale deed is

the highest in extent, being 328 ½ square yards @ Rs.490/- per

square yards. Also, as regards Ex.A-3, P.W-7-vendee of the said

document was examined. He deposed to the effect that he

purchased land admeasuring 194 square yards in Sy.No.173/A of

Damaracherla Village @ Rs.490/- per square yard.

16. In the instant case, the draft notification under Section 4(1)

of the Act was published on 28.01.2009. Exs.A-2 and A-3-sale

transactions pertain to the year 2006 i.e., within three years

preceding the date of draft notification. Therefore, it is fair and just 7 AKS,J & LNA, J

to rely upon Exs.A-2 and A-3 for fixing the market value of the

acquired lands and the market value mentioned in the said sale

deeds can be taken as a representative sale. Thus, the Reference

Court had rightly considered Ex.A-3 as an exemplar sale deed and

fixed the market value of the acquired lands @ Rs.490/- per square

yard.

17. However, this Court is of the considered view that the

Reference Court erred in adding escalation @ 12% per annum on

the market value assessed for the acquired lands since Ex.A-3 is

within the period of three years from the date of issuance of 4(1)

notification. The Reference Court also erred in deducting only 1/4th

towards developmental charges and it ought to have deducted 33%

towards developmental charges. By calculating thus, the market

value of the acquired lands works out to Rs.329/- per square yard,

i.e., after deducting 33% of Rs.490/-.

18. In the light of the facts and circumstances of the case and for

the foregoing reasons, this Appeal is allowed in part and the order

and decree dated 27.04.2015 passed in O.P.No.47 of 2013 on the

file of the Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda, is modified fixing the 8 AKS,J & LNA, J

market value of the acquired lands @ Rs.329/- per square yard. The

remaining portion of the impugned order of the Reference Court

remains unaltered. No order as to costs.

19. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall

stand closed.

_______________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J

___________________________________ LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J Dated: 25.07.2024 dr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter