Tuesday, 09, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P. Ghana Teja Rao vs The State Of Telangana
2024 Latest Caselaw 1524 Tel

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1524 Tel
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2024

Telangana High Court

P. Ghana Teja Rao vs The State Of Telangana on 16 April, 2024

      THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

          CRIMINAL PETITION No.5537 of 2023


ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.') by

the petitioner/accused No.1 seeking to quash the

proceedings against him in C.C.No.1231 of 2022 on the file

of the III Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally,

Hyderabad, for the alleged offences punishable under

Section 304(A) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short

'IPC') and Sections 130(1) and 177 of Motor Vehicles Act,

1988 (for short 'Act, 1988').

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 06.02.2022

the respondent No.2 lodged a complaint stating that on

05.02.2022 at about 17:10 hours his father by name Mandal

Ramesh was going from Erragadda towards Panjagutta on

his two wheeler vehicle bearing No.AP12C8953 and when he

reached near Ameerpet Metro Station, a four wheeler vehicle

bearing No.AP21AR0375 (red color nano) came in rash and

negligent manner and dashed the vehicle of his father due to

which he fell down and sustained injuries. The surrounding

SKS,J

people immediately arranged an ambulance and shifted him

to NIMS Hospital, Panjagutta and informed the respondent

No.2. Thereafter, when respondent No.2 rushed to the

hospital, he was informed that his father sustained serious

injury on head and due to blood clots, he went to coma.

3. On receipt of said complaint, the Police investigated

the matter and on completion of investigation a charge sheet

was filed, wherein, the petitioner was arrayed as accused

No.1. Aggrieved thereby, this Criminal Petition is filed.

4. Heard Sri Nabi Rasool Baladur, learned counsel for

petitioner/accused No.1, and Sri S.Ganesh, learned

Assistant Public Prosecutor, appearing for the respondent

No.1 - State. No representation on behalf of respondent

No.2.

5. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the

petitioner is falsely implicated in this case and that he is

nowhere concerned with the alleged offence. He informed

that the petitioner is pursuing graduation in Tapasya Degree

College, at Kukatpally. He contended that the father of

respondent No.2 came in high speed and hit the road wider

SKS,J

and by that time the petitioner was taking u turn due to

which the car hit the two wheeler from left side as a result of

which the father of respondent No.2 fell down and later died.

He further contended that after the incident the petitioner

and his family members insisted to get the CCTV footage but

the Police refused and the same clearly proves that the

petitioner is falsely implicated in this case. Therefore, prayed

this Court to allow the Criminal Petition by quashing the

proceedings against the petitioner.

6. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Public

Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by learned

counsel for petitioner and contended that the complaint

averments disclose that there was negligence on the part of

the petitioner and due to the said negligence and rash

driving the father of respondent No.2 sustained severe

injuries and later died due to the said injuries. Therefore,

stating that the matter requires a detailed trial, prayed this

Court to dismiss the Criminal Petition.

7. At this stage, it is pertinent to note the Judgment of

the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Madhya Pradesh

SKS,J

vs. Surendra Kori 1, wherein in paragraph No.14 it is held

as follows:

"The High Court in exercise of its powers under

Section 482 Cr.P.C. does not function as a Court of

appeal or revision. This Court has, in several

judgments, held that the inherent jurisdiction

under Section 482 Cr.P.C., though wide, has to be

used sparingly, carefully and with caution. The

High Court, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., should

normally refrain from giving a prima facie decision

in a case where the entire facts are incomplete and

hazy, more so when the evidence has not been

collected and produced before the Court and the

issues involved, whether factual or legal, are of

wide magnitude and cannot be seen in their true

perspective without sufficient material."

8. Having regard to the rival submissions made and

on going through the material placed on record, it is noted

that while dealing with the petition filed under Section 482

of C.P.C., the Court has to take into consideration the

averments made in the complaint and the averments

recorded in the statements of the witnesses and if the

averments made therein do not constitute any offence as

(2012) 10 SCC 155

SKS,J

alleged against the accused persons, then the proceedings

against the accused persons are liable to be quashed. In the

case on hand, there is no other material placed on record

except the complaint filed by respondent No.2. In such

circumstances, the Court is inclined to consider the

averments made in the complaint.

9. In the present case, though it is the specific

contention of learned counsel for petitioner/accused No.1

that the father of respondent No.2 died due to his own

negligence as the said two wheeler was in high speed, the

averments of the complaint would reveal that the

petitioner/accused No.1 was driving a four wheeler bearing

No.AP21AR0375 (red color nano) and came in rash and

negligent manner and ultimately dashed the two wheeler

due to which the father of respondent No.2 fell down and

sustained severe injuries and even after taking treatment, he

died. It is noted that except the complaint, no other

document or statement is filed, and the averments made in

the complaint requires trial to elicit whether due to whose

negligence the accident occurred. As such, at this stage, the

question of quashing the proceedings against the

petitioner/accused No.1 does not arise.

SKS,J

10. In view of the above, and as per the law laid down

by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the State of Madhya

Pradesh vs. Surendra Kori (supra) this Court is of the view

that there are no merits in this Criminal Petition and the

same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Criminal

Petition is dismissed.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall

also stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J

Date:16.04.2024 PT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter