Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3649 Tel
Judgement Date : 12 July, 2022
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN
SECOND APPEAL No.17 of 2022
JUDGMENT:
Learned counsel for the appellants stated that the second
appeal is filed on the instructions of the High Court Legal
Services Committee against the Judgment and decree, dated
26.09.2011, passed in A.S.No.215 of 2006 on the file of IV
Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents furnished a
copy of Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.2938 of 2016 and
payment of amount in terms of the undertaking given before the
Hon'ble Apex Court. The Special Leave Appeal was filed against
the orders passed in S.A.No.1437 of 2011 on the file of this
Court. The said Second Appeal was filed aggrieved by the
judgment and decree, dated 26.09.2011, passed in A.S.No.215
of 2006 on the file of IV Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy
District. The present second appeal is also filed aggrieved by
the same judgment and decree passed in the said first appeal.
3. It appears that suppressing disposal of the previous
second appeal, the present second appeal was filed aggrieved by
the judgment and decree passed in the same first appeal and
request was made to legal services authority to take up the
litigation.
4. In the light of the previous orders, this second
appeal is liable to be dismissed as not maintainable.
5. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed as not
maintainable.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal
shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________ JUTICE M. LAXMAN
JULY 12, 2022 YVL
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN
SECOND APPEAL No.17 of 2022 12.07.2022 YVL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!