Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4793 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 127/2022
Vimal Chand Lodha, Manager Karta And Owner Firm Mishrilal
Vimalchand Lodha H.u.f. through LRs.
----Petitioners
Versus
Smt. Rabiya Rehmani W/o Abdul Mujeeb Rehmani through LRs.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Singh Meratwal for Mr. Ashvin Garg For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 13/07/2022
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the suit for
eviction was filed against the respondent-tenant wherein after
service of notice, respondent did not turn up and the suit was
decreed in ex-parte vide judgment dated 24.04.2002 but decree
for eviction was put for execution and in the execution
proceedings possession has been delivered to petitioner-
decreeholder on 05.05.2003.
Thereafter the respondent-tenant has filed an application
under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC dated 13.05.2003, the trial court has
allowed the application vide impugned order dated 19.05.2022.
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that there is no
sufficient cause to explain the non-appearance of the respondent-
tenant and notices were served properly in accordance with law.
The trial court has committed jurisdictional error in setting aside
(2 of 2) [CR-127/2022]
the ex-parte decree.
Heard.
Admit.
Issue notice to respondents.
Record of the application under order 9 rule 13 CPC as well
as the original suit No.105/2001 be summoned.
In the meanwhile and till further orders, the operation of
impugned order dated 19.05.2022 shall remain stayed.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
TN/19
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!