Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4662 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 28/2005
General Manager Bharat Sanchar
----Appellant
Versus
Beena Mathur
----Respondent
Connected With S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 114/2005 Secretary J D A Jaipur
----Appellant Versus Smt Beena Mathur And Ors
----Respondent S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 71/2007 Mayor M C Jaipur
----Appellant Versus Smt Beena Mathur And Ors
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ravindra Pal Singh Mr. Yuvraj Samant For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma for Municipal Corporation Mr. Bhonri Lal Sharma Mr. Bhanu Prakash Verma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
08/07/2022
All three appeals arises against judgment and decree dated
18.10.2004 passed by Additional District Judge No.5, Jaipur City,
Jaipur in Civil Suit No.98/1998 whereby respondents-claimants
have been awarded a compensation of Rs.3,77,000/- on account
of death of their husband/father (bread earner).
(2 of 2) [CFA-28/2005]
It has been informed that in all three appeals, appellants
have deposited 1/3rd- 1/3rd share of compensation amount which
is laying deposited in FDRs.
It has been submitted that respondents-claimants have not
received any amount out of awarded compensation as they could
not furnish bank guarantee. Respondents-claimants have moved
an application (No.1/2022) with a prayer to disburse the
compensation amount in all three appeals. A copy of application
be supplied to respective counsel appearing for appellants.
List these appeals again on 20.07.2022 in supplementary
list.
In the meanwhile, respondents-claimants are at liberty to
furnish affidavit explaining circumstances for not able to furnish
the bank guarantee.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
NITIN/54-46
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!