Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15263 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 October, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 683/2020 In S.B. Criminal Appeal No.743/2020
Bhagga Ram S/o Prabhu Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Kaddo Ki Dhani, Setrawa Village, Dechu Police Station, District Jodhpur (Lodged in Central Jail, Jodhpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B. Ray Bishnoi
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Order
01/10/2021
This present application for suspension of sentences under
Section 389 CrPC has been preferred on behalf of the appellant-
applicant Bhagga Ram who has been convicted and sentenced vide
judgment dated 17.08.2020 passed by learned Sessions Judge,
Pali in Sessions Case No.116/2016 (17/2020) for the offence
under Section 8/15 of the NDPS Act.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant-applicant, learned
Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
Arguing on the application for suspension of sentences, it is
submitted by learned counsel for the applicant-appellant that
during the statement of PW-15 Ganpat Singh, in his examination-
in-chief itself he stated that, ^^vkfVZdy la[;k 10 Qvk gqvk gS rFkk ftl ij psik yxk gS ftl ij , ls ch esjs] lh ls Mh eqyfte ds] bZ ls ,Q o th ls ,p
(2 of 4) [SOSA-683/2020]
eksrfcjku ds gLrk{kj rFkk ,Dl LFkku ij uewuk lhy gSA vkfVZdy la[;k 12 ij psik yxk gS tks vk/kk Qvk gqvk gS ftl ij , ls ch esjs gLrk{kj gSA mDr cksjk QVk gqvk gSA vkfVZdy la[;k 10 rFkk 12 ds vykok fdlh Hkh cksjs ij psik ugha Fkk rFkk lHkh cksjs QVss gq, gSA ,d VkV dk cksjk QV tkus ds dkj.k cksjs dk eky IykfLVd ds dV~Vs esa Mkyk x;k Fkk ftl ij vkfVZdy la[;k 22 vafdr fd;k x;k gS ftl ij dksbZ psik ugha gSA^^ While submitting copy of the order dated 10.08.2017 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the
case of Kheta Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Suspension of
Sentence(Appeal) No. 778/2017, he stated that in similarly
situated case, benefit of bail has been granted to the accused-
appellant. Learned counsel relied upon the judgments rendered by
this Court in the cases of Shrawan Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan
(S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application (SOS) No.42/2016; Banwari
Vs. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Criminal Appeal No.136/2014);
Ramehswar Lal @ Ramesh Chandra Vs. State of Rajasthan (S.B.
Criminal Appeal No.535/2015); etc.. Learned counsel further
stated that applicant appellant is behind the bars for 6 years and
09 months. Lastly, learned counsel has submitted that final
decision of the appeal is likely to take considerable time, and,
therefore, it would be appropriate to keep applicants-appellants
under further incarceration.
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor stated that alleged
contraband 409 kgs poppy husk have been recovered from the
applicant-appellant and the same has also been proved by the
prosecution but not controverted this fact that as per custody
certificate which has placed on record, appellant had undergone
sentence of 6 years and 07 months as on 05.07.2021.
In this background and having regard to the overall facts and
circumstances of the case, particularly looking to the statement of
(3 of 4) [SOSA-683/2020]
PW-15 Ganpat Singh as mentioned above, and law laid down by
this Court in abovementioned cases and the fact applicant
appellant is behind the bars for more than 6 years and 07 months,
therefore, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to
enlarge the applicant-appellant on bail by suspending his
sentences during the pendency of the appeal.
Accordingly, the instant application for suspension of
sentences filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is
ordered that the sentences passed by learned Sessions Judge, Pali
in Sessions Case No.116/2016 (17/2020) against the appellant-
applicant - Bhagga Ram S/o Prabhu Ram shall remain suspended
till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be released
on bail subject to the condition that he shall furnish a personal
bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sound and solvent
sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned
trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 08.11.2021 and
whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the
conditions indicated below:-
1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.
2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s),they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
(4 of 4) [SOSA-683/2020]
The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of
the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered
as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the
accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this
order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal
Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose
relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In
case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial
court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High
Court for cancellation of bail.
(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J
279-Arvind/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!